Hiro Starbrook Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 This topic has been discussed often but I still have a question.I have a fairly beefy self-build PC (Intel Core i7 2700K, 8Gb RAM, SSD etc) with an AMD 6950 graphics card (2Gb memory). I installed the latest AMD drivers who are supposed to have improved OpenGL support. SL is running okay but I had expected more somehow. Ultra is still not advised setting for example.My question is whether someone knows whether an AMD graphic card with these new drivers is comparable in SL performance with an Nvidia card, or whether an Nvidia card is still better? Does somebody have experience? Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alicia Sautereau Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 The nvidia cards still perform better with sl, wich is why i dumped my 4 5870`s for 3 580 wich performs better by 15 to 20 fps on even higher settings *edit* typo`s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nalates Urriah Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Don't let the viewers default setting for your card influence you. The viewer's take on new video cards is notoriously poor. Set your graphics the way you want and see how it performs. There are posts in this thread: How Fast is Your Viewer? - Second Life where people have added their information and a rough performance indication. It is not scientific, but it will give you an idea of what kind of performance others are getting. Add your info to the thread. You probably understand your graphics settings, but if not check out: Graphics Tweaking for Second Life If you are looking for performance bottlenecks read: How To get a Faster Second Life. It is mostly about upgrading, but my idea was to help people find which part of their system needed to be upgraded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alicia Sautereau Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 No offense intended Nalates, you talk about bottlenecks but not evening covering about memory speed while advising the use of ramdisk If people with older machines attempt this with with normal speed memory and harddisc, their windows startup/shutdown will explode exponantialy Dual/tripple/quad channel makes a difference also Also forget about normal sata drives, the small 32gig ssd`s wich are perfect for these sort of operations, not to mention a revo drive if you got some money lying on the side. Also about shutting down/disabling all the windows tasks (services), this is a very bad idea as programs use all sort of window services and windows aswell Sure, some are useless, but having 1 program/component not working "1 day" is more of an headache to try and figure out what won`t run then leaving it on (expirience) I would defenetly put a red colored warning that this is for adavnced users or else the might be driven insane to a format and reinstall to fix it This year we`ll be hitting the 600 range of nvidia cards, the 7000 for ati and allready at the socket 2011 cpu`s I think i`ve missed the part about the upgrade in your article *edit* In all fairness, the graphics link is good, but wanted to add 1 thing On faster machines when you get an high fps, using 8 pre-render, vertical sync and tripple buffer *can* work great You will get a lower fps but the fram transition would be smoother This is ofcourse for every one to play with as it`s reall case by case and could improve 1 app/game while killing the other but for sl it works for me very nicely Don`t try this at home kids, it will kill your fps faster then you can blink Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now