Resident to resident EULAs

[Chelsea Malibu]

---

Madeliefste Oh wrote:

I find it hard to explain this in English, but I'll give it a try.

LL is not responsable for the damage you and your neighbour bring to each other when you have a a fight. But LL is responsable to a certain degree for the content on it's servers. LL is by law obligated to take down content that infringes someones copyright. But as long as LL doesn't know that there is an infringement, LL cannot be held responsable for hosting 'illegal' content.

So that some people do sell products that infringes someones copyrights (sometimes copyrights of big compagnies) can be possible because the legal IP right holder never found out about these infringements, or because he did not claim his rights.

Only when the IP rightholder sends in a claim in the light of dmca is LL obligated by law to receive the claim and have it investigated by its copyright agent. LL is also obligated to take the content from the servers when a dmca claim is valid.

 

The day that a server provider by law will be made responsable to solve the issues that his users have among each other, is the day that LL will intervene in resident to resident conflicts. That day will never arrive.

---

Perfectly stated.