Jump to content

Will building in SL always be free?


You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 4326 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Recommended Posts

With all the talk of Mesh and "prim cost"; I'm concerned that in the future, Residents may be charged to rez a cube.

I believe that charging a fee to build would be a bad idea. I really hope that this is not the plan.

I welcome any comments, insights or opinions from other Residents about this topic. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing to be worried about there - prim cost is a term created by LL in regards to server rendering cost (NOT payment cost). It is a measure used to calculate mesh cost in a sim - so a single mesh is thus given a prim equivalency depending on its complexity. (This is a heated topic over in the mesh forum, which I won't go into detail about here).

But yah, nothing to be concerned about - keep rezzing those prims! :matte-motes-smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Developing a good product requires resources, I don't think it is free.

I enjoy building and sandboxes work but having a place to work on a project for several weeks undisturbed would be ideal. I've had the privilege of working in an empty full Region for building and I would recommend it to any Builder.  

Even the best structural design will have some surfaces that will require custom textures.

I like to build; I have no idea what color the floor should be. I made this whole thing; doesn't that count for anything?

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Building as never been free. (>_<)

The "Prim Tax" proved itself to be bad policy long ago and the current land/parcel ownership model a reasonable compromise so far.  Charging for asset uploads will likely continue to be a means to fund the storage space necessary to contain the resulting assets.  Gladly it continues to be inworld money and not some sort of wonky Paypal scheme. (^_^)y

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Imnotgoing Sideways wrote:

Building as never been free. (>_<)

The "Prim Tax" proved itself to be bad policy long ago and the current land/parcel ownership model a reasonable compromise so far.  Charging for asset uploads will likely continue to be a means to fund the storage space necessary to contain the resulting assets.  Gladly it continues to be inworld money and not some sort of wonky Paypal scheme. (
^_^
)y

 

 

technically building can be free, there are plenty of free legal textures.

i think some day soon the SL interface will be without build tools for free accounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes "Prim Cost" is not a cost in $ for prims.

It refers to a mesh = X prims in rendering "cost" or time/resource used by system.

The only new cost you can expect is if you upload a mesh, it will cost moderately more than L$10 per upload.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

while I'd like to see continued buidling being free (such as it is), I am among those who wish that sale right were limited at creation time to accounts that had payment information on file.... unfortunately it'd be nearly impossible to implement and still be backwards compatible for any modifiable content already in world. (the system I envision would tie a salable flag to each item on creation.... NPIOF, not salable, even by next owners. PIOF, salable unless permissions are set otherwise)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Void Singer wrote:

while I'd like to see continued buidling being free (such as it is), I am among those who wish that sale right were limited at creation time to accounts that had payment information on file.... unfortunately it'd be nearly impossible to implement and still be backwards compatible for any modifiable content already in world. (the system I envision would tie a salable flag to each item on creation.... NPIOF, not salable, even by next owners. PIOF, salable unless permissions are set otherwise)

thats just wrong, same as mesh import restrictions.

i can see it coming but its so wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so you don't think people selling things should be accountable in any way? you don't think LL should at least make a reasonable effort to stop the flow and sale of stolen items? and what exactly is "wrong" about it? I'm not suggesting people pay to build, I'm not even suggesting they shouldn't be able to give away things they make. I'm only suggesting that anyone making a profit should be accountable at some level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Void Singer wrote:

so you don't think people selling things should be accountable in any way? you don't think LL should at least make a reasonable effort to stop the flow and sale of stolen items? and what exactly is "wrong" about it? I'm not suggesting people pay to build, I'm not even suggesting they shouldn't be able to give away things they make. I'm only suggesting that anyone making a profit should be accountable at some level.

thats 2 different things, being accountable and having payment on file aren't the same thing.

we are all accountable.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

really? how? please explain how a user on his 50th account selling stolen content and then funneling the cash flow through a dozen alts is "accountable". who repays the users that bought from this person when LL finally catches on and deletes that content? how does the original creator pursue compensation for their losses with no way to access information on who this thief is through legal channels, when that information does not exist?

and seriously, tell me what's "wrong" about requiring people making a profit on something to provide basic information on who they are to LL? it's surely a lot less onerous than all the various trade and merchant licenses and related costs and renewals of RL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Void Singer wrote:

really? how? please explain how a user on his 50th account selling stolen content and then funneling the cash flow through a dozen alts is "accountable". who repays the users that bought from this person when LL finally catches on and deletes that content? how does the original creator pursue compensation for their losses with no way to access information on who this thief is through legal channels, when that information does not exist?

and seriously, tell me what's "wrong" about requiring people making a profit on something to provide basic information on who they are to LL? it's surely a lot less onerous than all the various trade and merchant licenses and related costs and renewals of RL.

whats wrong is you need to have paid LL some cash for something.

ips can be blocked, thats enough accountability.

you are accusing everyone without payment on file of being a thief basically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Cinnamon Lohner wrote:

Given the fact that to do a good build, you need a good collection of textures and to do a truly unique build, you need to do your own textures that cost 10L each to upload.  So I guess my answer is another question.  Is building in SL actually free??

--Cinn

Maybe years ago. But today, no one would buy a prim build with a blank texture and solid color from the menu on it.

Even if people make their own textures it's 10L per upload.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Dogboat Taurog wrote:

whats wrong is you need to have paid LL some cash for something. [...]

 this statement is incorrect. PIOF does not require paying LL anything. you are thinking of PIU, which is NOT what is required.


ips can be blocked, thats enough accountability.

you are accusing everyone without payment on file of being a thief basically.

in case you've missed it, IP blocking is what LL has already tried doing, and the thieves come back within minutes of being banned... even when using hardware ID. I've witnessed it first hand. the tools to do so are available freely even if one doesn't have the knowledge to do so manually.

I am not accusing anyone of anything, nor is LL. payment information is being used in the same way a pawn shop verifies identify for goods they purchase, so that thieves can be tracked, and legitimate users have effective means of not only pursuing people that steal from them, but also an effective end for reporting stolen content and possibly even recouping their losses if they are defrauded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Void Singer wrote:


Dogboat Taurog wrote:

whats wrong is you need to have paid LL some cash for something. [...]

 this statement is incorrect. PIOF does not require paying LL anything. you are thinking of PIU, which is NOT what is required.

Second, if you have never given us billing information, you'll need to enter it into your account. Why, you ask? Because having payment information on file is an important step in establishing direct relationships with content creators who will be working in mesh. Note: We do realize that with the current configuration, some Residents will need to make a purchase in order to enter their billing information.


ips can be blocked, thats enough accountability.

you are accusing everyone without payment on file of being a thief basically.

in case you've missed it, IP blocking is what LL has already tried doing, and the thieves come back within minutes of being banned... even when using hardware ID. I've witnessed it first hand. the tools to do so are available freely even if one doesn't have the knowledge to do so manually.

I am not accusing anyone of anything, nor is LL. payment information is being used in the same way a pawn shop verifies identify for goods they purchase, so that thieves can be tracked, and legitimate users have effective means of not only pursuing people that steal from them, but also an effective end for reporting stolen content and possibly even recouping their losses if they are defrauded.

so credit cards can be stolen and bank accounts cant be stolen, nice try but you fail here.

i dont know how you can speak for LL btw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Dogboat Taurog wrote:

Second, if you have never given us billing information, you'll need to enter it into your account. Why, you ask? Because having payment information on file is an important step in establishing direct relationships with content creators who will be working in mesh. Note: We do realize that with the current configuration, some Residents will need to make a purchase in order to enter their billing information.


 only applies to people who do not have a debit/credit card or US paypal, which is a vanishingly small amount of users with extunuating circumstances.... that it's available at all is pretty rare in online service.

 


so credit cards can be stolen and bank accounts cant be stolen, nice try but you fail here.

but stolen financial information can be traced, reported, and blacklisted... doing the same with IP addresses is an exercise in futility, since they don't identify an individual. so nice try but you fail doubly there.

 


i dont know how you can speak for LL btw.

 because I can read, and nowhere have they stated such an accusation (quite the opposite), so the only person here pretending to speak for others and put words in their mouth is you... but that seems to be a bad habit of yours already

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Void Singer wrote:


Dogboat Taurog wrote:

Second, if you have never given us billing information, you'll need to enter it into your account. Why, you ask? Because having payment information on file is an important step in establishing direct relationships with content creators who will be working in mesh. Note: We do realize that with the current configuration, some Residents will need to make a purchase in order to enter their billing information.


 only applies to people who do not have a debit/credit card or US paypal, which is a vanishingly small amount of users with extunuating circumstances.... that it's available at all is pretty rare in online service.

 

so credit cards can be stolen and bank accounts cant be stolen, nice try but you fail here.

but stolen financial information can be traced, reported, and blacklisted... doing the same with IP addresses is an exercise in futility, since they don't identify an individual. so nice try but
you
fail doubly there.

 

i dont know how you can speak for LL btw.

 because I can read, and nowhere have they stated such an accusation (quite the opposite), so the only person here pretending to speak for others and put words in their mouth is you... but that seems to be a bad habit of yours already

i think your tag is making you think you are way above where you really are.

i'm not the only person pointing this payment crap out.

i don't put words in anyones mouth or talk for them.

im quoting LL.

i havent failed at all, you just havent thought about it, and haven't considered other peoples comments.

can't force you to understand i guess.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My sig is a self effacing joke, about how at one time in LL's effort to block the spammer, no one could quote me or use my name on the forums without their posts getting moderated.... rather than get mad about it, I turned it into a joke.

as for understanding, I understand your position perfectly well, and reject it, because it doesn't fit the facts. but feel free to keep grasping at straws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 4326 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...