CLPP Participant Code of Conduct?

[Yorkie Bardeen]

I have read the wiki entry for the Community Land Partnership Program, and I did not see anything in there relating to the behaviour of CLPP Participants as a requirement, so perhaps the question is answered, but I wonder if anyone knows if LL expects or enforces a code of conduct for CLPP admins that they would otherwise not get involved in for fully private estates.

I'm not directly involved myself, but someone I know has copped an estate ban from one of the larger CLPP estates. Since this is the SL Forums people will say whatever about whether it was justified (from what I know of the person involved, it's utterly insane) so I won't go into the details. Rather, I'll ask this question as a hypothetical to apply generally.

What I am wondering is if CLPP admins are supposed to be held to a higher standard when it comes to who they can ban (and block from travel access to other, adjoined CLPP and mainland areas) on the basis of rumour, hearsay, or personal animus, as opposed to clear and evident griefing etc.

[Diablo Lioncourt]

18 hours ago, Yorkie Bardeen said:

What I am wondering is if CLPP admins are supposed to be held to a higher standard when it comes to who they can ban (and block from travel access to other, adjoined CLPP and mainland areas)

No. Policies just say they have to follow the rules and community standards. Everything about keeping things open and allowing access doesn't apply to banned residents and that's explicitly worded into every mention of open access in the policies.

Banned residents are defined by the estate. There's nothing beyond that about how or what residents they can ban.

Edited August 18 by Diablo Lioncourt