Roxy Couturier Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 It's a totally cute 'in your face' rainbow coaster. Any resemblance to a cat butt is purely coincidental! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowan Amore Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codex Alpha Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 45 minutes ago, Love Zhaoying said: I've found in general, and especially on the Forum, that those who accuse others of "lies" are "projecting". Except for maybe TWO posters who like to stir things up, I am literally not aware of anyone lying. Put simply, "liars accuse everyone else of lying, because they assume everyone is lying, because they themselves lie a lot". I'm not saying YOU are a "liar", I am just pointing out a general principle I have observed with those who call others "liars". Unless you think I'm lying, but then that would prove my point. The only point you have on these forums is to increase your post count. 2 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graceblakeley Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 This thread keeps coming up on View New Posts and because I don't know what it's about I never looked before. I peep inside. All I know it is sad when a thread turns into this. People. Take a break. Please 😢 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cristiano Midnight Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 4 hours ago, Codex Alpha said: Frankly, it just amounts to "Me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me,me " ::breath:: "me, me, me, me me me" around here Ok I will bite. Unless you are referring to the original poster’s idea, which was about his wanting the parcels cleared of paying customers who have not signed in because of his whims, I fail to see how those not wanting this to happen to anyone is “me me me me”. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discussionbot Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 5 hours ago, Codex Alpha said: The only point you have on these forums is to increase your post count. You can exchange forum post count for free Lindens right? That's why everyone posts so much right? 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discussionbot Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 How do I get this decayed/removed? It's ruining my horizon, and the owner hasn't logged in for years On 6/6/2024 at 4:04 AM, Hal Winchester said: "The Man"' created by oldjohn Linden. The oldest object in-world Second Life, created July 19, 2002. Where am I? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madelaine McMasters Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 10 hours ago, Rowan Amore said: ...scritches your tummy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Hexem Posted June 18 Author Share Posted June 18 11 hours ago, MadameGloom Ravenwood said: In some cases there should be thread decay as well. There is! 8 hours ago, Cristiano Midnight said: parcels cleared of paying customers who have not signed in because of his whims Weren't you complaining about people complaining about straw men last time I was here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love Zhaoying Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 11 hours ago, Roxy Couturier said: It's a totally cute 'in your face' rainbow coaster. Any resemblance to a cat butt is purely coincidental! You're right! Some people see "cat butts" every place they look!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cristiano Midnight Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 7 minutes ago, Paul Hexem said: There is! Weren't you complaining about people complaining about straw men last time I was here? What did I say that was untrue? You want entire builds to decay (aka be removed) if a paying customer has not logged in after a certain period of time, even though they continue to pay for the land in absentia. That is the entire foundation for your suggestion. You even acknowledged that opt in would not work, so people would have this forced upon them. Hell no. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love Zhaoying Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 8 hours ago, Cristiano Midnight said: Ok I will bite. Unless you are referring to the original poster’s idea, which was about his wanting the parcels cleared of paying customers who have not signed in because of his whims, I fail to see how those not wanting this to happen to anyone is “me me me me”. I believe the answer is, anyone who disagrees is somehow all "me me me me me". 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cristiano Midnight Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 1 minute ago, Love Zhaoying said: You're right! Some people see "cat butts" every place they look!!! Sadly it is normally when I wake up and turn my head in bed. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roxy Couturier Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 4 minutes ago, Love Zhaoying said: You're right! Some people see "cat butts" every place they look!!! 2 minutes ago, Cristiano Midnight said: Sadly it is normally when I wake up and turn my head in bed. Look, I know y'all want more cat butt, but (see what I did there?) I'm not pressing my luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Hexem Posted June 18 Author Share Posted June 18 3 minutes ago, Cristiano Midnight said: What did I say that was untrue? Almost all of it? Parcels cleared of their owners =/= autoreturn of abandoned objects. At my whims =/= Predetermined guidelines and settings. That's the kind of bad faith misrepresentation that made this over 20 pages long. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love Zhaoying Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 (edited) Personally, I think if this was a "bad faith troll thread", @Paul Hexem did an OK job of defending it when I quoted all the points yesterday. However, I don't recall in the OP itself (but later in the thread) a discussion of WHY this is something one would want. The first sentence is all we get: "One feature I really like about certain building games I think would be a wonderful addition to Second Life." I do not think that because someone likes a feature about other games, is justification for adding it to Second Life. Lacking the "WHY", and discounting (ignoring) the examples given later in the thread of "Oh, they're blocking my view! Oh, there's massive ugly trash on my neighbor's land!", I see it more as a "thought experiment". Restated: If you re-read the OP, then the Title "SL should have object decay" - lacking any justification, it's a non-starter. Sure, we discussed justification later, but that's not a really valid excuse for a thread that was a little sus in the first place. ("Oops, I left out the why. You mean it's not obvious?" could be an expected answer sometimes, but I don't agree, especially this time.) In my real opinion, the burden for requesting such a change should be on the justification; if the OP can't provide that, then why should the rest of us? Good job, @Paul Hexem Edited June 18 by Love Zhaoying Changed "requestion" to "requesting" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love Zhaoying Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 2 minutes ago, Paul Hexem said: Almost all of it? Parcels cleared of their owners =/= autoreturn of abandoned objects. At my whims =/= Predetermined guidelines and settings. That's the kind of bad faith misrepresentation that made this over 20 pages long. Assuming "= / = " is to represent "does not equal"! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cristiano Midnight Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 1 minute ago, Paul Hexem said: Almost all of it? Parcels cleared of their owners =/= autoreturn of abandoned objects. At my whims =/= Predetermined guidelines and settings. That's the kind of bad faith misrepresentation that made this over 20 pages long. I have been respectful up to this point, but that is absolute *****. Auto returning the objects on land owned by other people is the ENTIRE basis of your hairbrained suggestion. I said parcels cleared, meaning the objects removed from them, even though IT IS THEIR LAND. You absolutely know what I meant. Talk about bad faith representation. You are ridiculous. 20 pages just clarified in stark relief what an absurd idea your suggestion is. 4 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Hexem Posted June 18 Author Share Posted June 18 2 minutes ago, Love Zhaoying said: Assuming "= / = " is to represent "does not equal"! Correct. Shortform for "not the same as". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Hexem Posted June 18 Author Share Posted June 18 1 minute ago, Cristiano Midnight said: I said parcels cleared Of owners, not objects. That's very different. Saying "you know what I meant" doesn't fix it. 4 minutes ago, Cristiano Midnight said: You are ridiculous. Maybe. But I think I'd rather be ridiculous than an over emotional liar. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Nightingale Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 (edited) 41 minutes ago, Madelaine McMasters said: ...scritches your tummy Last time I did that, to a random kitten which was lying just like that, which had turned up on our doorstep when I got home... It was a trap! As soon as I started to tickle the cute, innocent looking kitten, it closed the trap like a Venus fly trap, all four cute little paws hooking their claws into my wrist as the kitten gnawed on my thumb! I lifted it up, like the guy in the movie "the blob" when it got on his hand, with the kitten still gnawing on me and hooked in for keeps. I pleaded with my wife for help, she just laughed out loud. Never again... kittens are evil! (until I see another one looking irresistibly cute...) Edited June 18 by Rick Nightingale 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cristiano Midnight Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 Also, there can be no predetermined settings for existing land, as the owners did not agree to having their builds removed “to move SL forward” or whatever you claimed was the reason why forced removal is good for SL. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cristiano Midnight Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Paul Hexem said: Of owners, not objects. That's very different. Saying "you know what I meant" doesn't fix it. Maybe. But I think I'd rather be ridiculous than an over emotional liar. Show me where the hell I said cleared of owners. I said parcels cleared of paying customers, meaning people are paying for the land still that you want cleared. My god, you cannot be this obtuse. Edited June 18 by Cristiano Midnight 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cristiano Midnight Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 5 minutes ago, Paul Hexem said: Maybe. But I think I'd rather be ridiculous than an over emotional liar. Show me a single thing I have said that was untrue. You can’t back up what you are saying, so everything is a straw man and people are liars. Keep calling me a liar, see how that works out. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramen Jedburgh Posted June 18 Share Posted June 18 The problem of dead/zombie accounts having all the choice land and never using it could be solved by terraforming in more water ways across the large chunks of abandoned land. And any "eyesore builds" can be muted/blocked by the viewer. I have done this several times with entire active mall style buildings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr
Recommended Posts
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now