FairreLilette Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 (edited) 16 hours ago, Talligurl said: Wow my picture is way more awesome than this picture by Van Gough, yeah right what a load of malarky; Talligurl, it's not really looking for awesome photos, it's looking for awesome photos that can sell a product and particularly a general audience product it seems to me. They show stock photos on their main page, it's just group shots of nothing really terribly arty or unique but it's shows business togetherness, a family hug, etc, hence - general audience. Stock photos are used for selling products and are not really artistic photos. I put in what little I had of my few lingerie photos along with various other portrait style portraits of various avatars. My lingerie scored on average about 2% very low I thought, while some of my avatar portraits with space around the photo scored pretty high and a few almost hit 100% because it looks like every day girl with space around the photo to write stuff on in order to sell a product. Stock photo sources also look for photos of people doing average ordinary things too or living every day life and you can see your bikini shot and the tennis photo above scored very high. It's not about art or how we look, but rather how it can be used to sell something and it's usually general audience every day life kind of photos that may actually sell in a stock photo house as well as rate high because they are just a general audience, day-in-the-life kind of thing. Btw, the family hug picture they show is terrible and badly composed but it could be cropped and probably sell. Edited March 4, 2021 by FairreLilette 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neopolaris Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 Hi there 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowan Amore Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 42 minutes ago, FairreLilette said: Talligurl, it's not really looking for awesome photos, it's looking for awesome photos that can sell a product and particularly a general audience product it seems to me. They show stock photos on their main page, it's just group shots of nothing really terribly arty or unique but it's shows business togetherness, a family hug, etc, hence - general audience. Stock photos are used for selling products and are not really artistic photos. I put in what little I had of my few lingerie photos along with various other portrait style portraits of various avatars. My lingerie scored on average about 2% very low I thought, while some of my avatar portraits with space around the photo scored pretty high and a few almost hit 100% because it looks like every day girl with space around the photo to write stuff on in order to sell a product. Stock photo sources also look for photos of people doing average ordinary things too or living every day life and you can see your bikini shot and the tennis photo above scored very high. It's not about art or how we look, but rather how it can be used to sell something and it's usually general audience every day life kind of photos that may actually sell in a stock photo house as well as rate high because they are just a general audience, day-in-the-life kind of thing. Btw, the family hug picture they show is terrible and badly composed but it could be cropped and probably sell. Two bikini shots with background and one scores 0%? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Carling Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 (edited) That's their secret algorithm. They worked 2 years on it. llFrand(100.0) 😎 Edited March 4, 2021 by Doc Carling 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairreLilette Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 2 hours ago, Rowan Amore said: Two bikini shots with background and one scores 0%? I went back and saw the second bikini shot and began to wonder myself why preference for one and not the other. Perhaps the programming liked the full body shot of the female as opposed to the half body shot? Still, yeah, that is weird. But, what I'm saying is that what most stock photos are -very generic, showing something in every day life. When I scored high on my portraits it seemed to like my long hair the best rather than the photo itself because the portrait I submitted IS terrible and looks more like a cartoon than a real person as it's mis-shaped BUT my hair is perfect and quite unusual and a gorgeous hair too by Doux. My favorite by Doux. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairreLilette Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 See here is a photo of the hair it keeps liking. There is nothing great about this photo. It looks just like a generic every day girl but she has great long hair. It loves this hair no matter what photo I put in. It is not an awesome photo...it's just kind of plain with great hair and space to write stuff on for a brochure or something to sell. My lingerie photos it scores below 2 and I think I have some good lingerie photos but they wouldn't be for every day life use. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrsSeren Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 Sighs still don't like redheads but even worse gets my hair colour totally wrong! I'm not a brunette so rudes! https://gyazo.com/e6bb31051c8db55f2369f90e1bb15849 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairreLilette Posted March 4, 2021 Share Posted March 4, 2021 7 minutes ago, MrsSeren said: Sighs still don't like redheads but even worse gets my hair colour totally wrong! I'm not a brunette so rudes! https://gyazo.com/e6bb31051c8db55f2369f90e1bb15849 That's dang cute too! Baffling program. 🤔 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rabid Cheetah Posted March 5, 2021 Share Posted March 5, 2021 On 3/3/2021 at 7:18 AM, Marianne Little said: Oookay... I should stop updating my avatar. The two top pictures is older, with Lelutka Simone, the 2 bottom with Lelutka evo Lake. Newest image in the bottom.... 😭 The second one 😍 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rabid Cheetah Posted March 5, 2021 Share Posted March 5, 2021 Avis Over Time - With Ratings 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PermaRuthed Posted March 5, 2021 Share Posted March 5, 2021 My best scores. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nando Yip Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 LOL 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rachel1206 Posted March 6, 2021 Share Posted March 6, 2021 (edited) On 3/3/2021 at 8:11 AM, Bree Giffen said: I was playing again with the Artbreeder site and remixed an SL avatar. I decided to go to Everypixel and have the neural network evaluate my image. It came back with a 6.3% chance of my image being awesome. Wonderful. https://www.everypixel.com/aesthetics https://www.artbreeder.com/ Research have shown that just minor changes of an image can fool neural networks, even one pixel only, where the neural network categorized a horse as a frog! ( FYI, see IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol.23 , Issue.5 , pp. 828--841. Publisher: IEEE. 2019 Clearly EveryPixel's neural network is badly made and biased towards certain traits. In general this is a problem with serious neural networks used all over the world, where they are biased with caucasian input, western world demographics. The implemications are major, for example law enformement using neural networks, banks using neural networks to evalute a loaner etc. Edited March 6, 2021 by Rachel1206 spelling 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr
Recommended Posts
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now