Jordan Whitt 5,835 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 37 minutes ago, Scylla Rhiadra said: Yeah, but why would you believe that? We're all commies and socialists anyways. Except Arielle, of course. And me! I'm a fascist Karen!! 6 Link to post Share on other sites
Silent Mistwalker 2,202 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 1 minute ago, Jordan Whitt said: And me! I'm a fascist Karen!! 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Arielle Popstar 1,063 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 32 minutes ago, Scylla Rhiadra said: Life is so much easier if you restrict yourself to seeing and hearing people you already know you agree with. Dialogue? Discussion? Different perspectives? New information? Pffft. That's for SJWs! But at the end of the day is there any real difference between blocking people and their ideas or articles on websites you don't like? I see it time and again where an idea presented on a Right wing site or even one non political but challenging of what is considered to be mainstream science is brushed off without consideration. No dialogue, no discussion, closed minded to a different perspective or new information. To me this is treading very close to the pot and kettle syndrome. Link to post Share on other sites
Lyssa Greymoon 2,796 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 36 minutes ago, Arielle Popstar said: No matter. Once was enough to show how low they were willing to stoop. They counted the votes three times, got essentially the same answer three times, so where do the shenanigans fit in? 4 Link to post Share on other sites
Arielle Popstar 1,063 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 1 minute ago, Lyssa Greymoon said: They counted the votes three times, got essentially the same answer three times, so where do the shenanigans fit in? Immaterial. The shenanigans were still there regardless of whether the count was correct. Its like that idea where some will lie when the truth would have served them better. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Janet Voxel 5,933 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 4 minutes ago, Lyssa Greymoon said: They counted the votes three times, got essentially the same answer three times, so where do the shenanigans fit in? You mean the shenanigans where the president called the Georgia Secretary of State and said "Couldn't you just...I dunno find 10000 votes?" that was shared with the public? Or the super sekrit kind of shenanigans that you have to read non deep state news for? 5 Link to post Share on other sites
Scylla Rhiadra 29,533 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 4 minutes ago, Arielle Popstar said: But at the end of the day is there any real difference between blocking people and their ideas or articles on websites you don't like? I see it time and again where an idea presented on a Right wing site or even one non political but challenging of what is considered to be mainstream science is brushed off without consideration. No dialogue, no discussion, closed minded to a different perspective or new information. To me this is treading very close to the pot and kettle syndrome. Who says we don't read them? In fact, I went quite closely through the abstracts of a couple of papers you cited regarding the use of HCQ across different nations, and gave you, I think, a pretty detailed rundown on why they were invalid. I don't recall you responding. 2 3 Link to post Share on other sites
Scylla Rhiadra 29,533 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 18 minutes ago, Jordan Whitt said: And me! I'm a fascist Karen!! Yes yes yes, but you're not Canadian! Canadians are commies. Aussies are Karens. Silly. Link to post Share on other sites
Jordan Whitt 5,835 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 3 minutes ago, Scylla Rhiadra said: Yes yes yes, but you're not Canadian! Canadians are commies. Aussies are Karens. Silly. Omg you did NOT just call me Australian, did you??? Thems fighting words!!!!! 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Luna Bliss 6,059 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 13 minutes ago, Arielle Popstar said: But at the end of the day is there any real difference between blocking people and their ideas or articles on websites you don't like? I see it time and again where an idea presented on a Right wing site or even one non political but challenging of what is considered to be mainstream science is brushed off without consideration. No dialogue, no discussion, closed minded to a different perspective or new information. To me this is treading very close to the pot and kettle syndrome. I read them when I've had a bad day and need a good laugh. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Lyssa Greymoon 2,796 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 (edited) 6 hours ago, Janet Voxel said: You mean the shenanigans where the president called the Georgia Secretary of State and said "Couldn't you just...I dunno find 10000 votes?" that was shared with the public? Or the super sekrit kind of shenanigans that you have to read non deep state news for? Oh, no I mean the totally really real shenanigans where the fake numbers just happened to be exactly the same as the real ones, but it was a huge fraud. The conspirators were trying to change tens of thousands of votes but were so bad at their jobs they got caught and didn’t change any. Edited January 13 by Lyssa Greymoon Link to post Share on other sites
Janet Voxel 5,933 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 2 minutes ago, Lyssa Greymoon said: Oh, no I mean the totally really real shenanigans where the fake numbers just happened to be exactly the same as the real ones, but it was a huge fraud. The conspirators were trying to change tens of thousands of votes but were so bad at their jobs they didn’t change any. Now, now....try to be fair. They did find like 15 votes that weren't counted for Trump....game changer right there. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
foneco Zuzu 413 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Top House Republican Liz Cheney says she will vote to impeach Donald Trump:) 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Scylla Rhiadra 29,533 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 5 minutes ago, Jordan Whitt said: Omg you did NOT just call me Australian, did you??? Thems fighting words!!!!! Oh dear. Kiwi? Link to post Share on other sites
foneco Zuzu 413 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell has reportedly told colleagues that he believes Donald Trump has committed impeachable offenses and he’s glad the House is moving forward with impeachment. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Jordan Whitt 5,835 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 11 minutes ago, Scylla Rhiadra said: Oh dear. Kiwi? Princess Fascist Karen Kiwi to you! 😁 3 4 Link to post Share on other sites
Arielle Popstar 1,063 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 40 minutes ago, Scylla Rhiadra said: Who says we don't read them? In fact, I went quite closely through the abstracts of a couple of papers you cited regarding the use of HCQ across different nations, and gave you, I think, a pretty detailed rundown on why they were invalid. I don't recall you responding. You're right, I didn't. I mulled over what you had written for a couple days because quite honestly I really had no clue where to start. No doubt you explained it well enough but it was mostly over my head and since I was busy with R/L, just didn't have the time to puzzle it through. I still think the treatments mentioned under the various categories @ hcqmeta.com have a lot of validity but I don't have the expertise to convince those who are not interested in alternative solutions. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Rowan Amore 8,394 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 (edited) 1 hour ago, Arielle Popstar said: Immaterial. The shenanigans were still there regardless of whether the count was correct. Its like that idea where some will lie when the truth would have served them better. Did you even bother reading anything besides known conspiracy theory sites? Did you read the article from USA Today which does lean to the right but has never been accused of being a fake news resource by anyone except perhaps trump? It's not hard to debunk most of articles your.post as being from nutjob sites. Edited January 13 by RowanMinx 5 Link to post Share on other sites
Arielle Popstar 1,063 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 3 minutes ago, RowanMinx said: It's not hard to debunk most of articles your.post as being from nutjob sites. Thats not debunking, but simply pointing out that it isn't Democrat approved reading material. 1 4 Link to post Share on other sites
Rowan Amore 8,394 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 2 minutes ago, Arielle Popstar said: Thats not debunking, but simply pointing out that it isn't Democrat approved reading material You keep thinking it has something to do with a party. It has to do with not spouting unsubstantiated information as fact which is what a lot of the sites you post from do and it's dangerous. Anyway, facts are not what you're looking for so I'll bow out of this and let you believe all the conspiracies you'd like. 4 Link to post Share on other sites
Tari Landar 4,811 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 I'm just here to offer refreshments for the weary. And don't forget your plates, cutlery and napkins, all eco-friendly, plant them when you're done eating and replenish the earth (they probably aren't really, but I can make plates and napkins that are, and are seeded too) 2 3 Link to post Share on other sites
Vivienne Schell 331 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 (edited) 4 hours ago, Adamburp Adamczyk said: oh I had pondered that, but there's the whole issue of a) naming and shaming that Governance will react to, and b) the same categories i referred too crying in reports about my posts. So I can't post it Aaaaaaaaaaaw..... Edited January 13 by Vivienne Schell Link to post Share on other sites
Vivienne Schell 331 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 (edited) 1 hour ago, Arielle Popstar said: Thats not debunking, but simply pointing out that it isn't Democrat approved reading material. What about the Bible then? Edited January 13 by Vivienne Schell Link to post Share on other sites
Vivienne Schell 331 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 (edited) 3 hours ago, Arielle Popstar said: But at the end of the day is there any real difference between blocking people and their ideas or articles on websites you don't like? I see it time and again where an idea presented on a Right wing site or even one non political but challenging of what is considered to be mainstream science is brushed off without consideration. No dialogue, no discussion, closed minded to a different perspective or new information. To me this is treading very close to the pot and kettle syndrome. Science does not challenge 1+1=2. And if some people at so called "altenative" (ahem) websites claim that 1+1=3 in the headline, why bother to read the rest? Why should i have a dialogue with someone who either has no brain or is a cynic psycho? Edited January 13 by Vivienne Schell 2 Link to post Share on other sites
LittleMe Jewell 38,102 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 1 hour ago, Tari Landar said: I'm just here to offer refreshments for the weary. And don't forget your plates, cutlery and napkins, all eco-friendly, plant them when you're done eating and replenish the earth (they probably aren't really, but I can make plates and napkins that are, and are seeded too) While I am not religious at all.......... BLESS YOU Link to post Share on other sites
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr
Recommended Posts
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.