Jump to content

Protecting Second Life From Hate Groups Hiding & Organizing Here


You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 145 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Vivienne Schell said:

the very most neither are corrupt nor criminals nor "leeches" but they try to do what the souvereign ordered them to to.

And we are all entitled to our beliefs

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 979
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

^^^This^^^ is what scares me.  The belief that people are no longer allowed to have their own opinions, their own thoughts and have to fall in line with one narrative, one ideology.   Newsflash,

When did have a political opinion become "hate speech"?

What exactly do you expect them to do?  As with most things that are against the ToS, they will act appropriately when and if it is brought to their attention.  They have given us, the residents, the

Posted Images

7 minutes ago, Silent Mistwalker said:

It wasn't intended to control but to prevent and in the event of it actually happening, curtail it until such time the wheels of government/justice turn or the people revolt. Whichever comes first.

I believe they knew that the corruption would happen, hence the "curtailing it" (which is "controlling it").

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, LittleMe Jewell said:

I believe they knew that the corruption would happen, hence the "curtailing it" (which is "controlling it").

I wouldn't call curtail and control synonyms. I don't want to get into a semantics discussion either. lol

image.png.1e12fb655b5346096149c507dca65204.png

 

image.png.8cc82537028d889ae9e393f3923c6ee0.png

 

They are related but don't mean the same thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is time to consider our beloved founding fathers, trash all people in the government currently as corrupt, and bow our heads....

 

CrazyCrazy.jpg

Edited by Luna Bliss
  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Adamburp Adamczyk said:

food for thought on this thread.

 

Online hate on SL is easily remedied with the mute button.

FYI because of my prior statement, I read a  total of posts by a total of 5 posts by users.  Try it, you'll enjoy such  a calm method reading posts ^^

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this was supposed to be a serious discussion, but I just can’t shake the mental image of a furry, a bimbo, a nude muscleman and an edge lord with a stolen Naruto avatar on a beach somewhere in SL planning to overthrow the government.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Adamburp Adamczyk said:

FYI because of my prior statement, I read a  total of posts by a total of 5 posts by users.  Try it, you'll enjoy such  a calm method reading posts ^^

I don't really come to the forums to not read posts, though. :P

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Adamburp Adamczyk said:

a blocklist of 8 1/2 pages makes for such nice reading though ^^

I don't understand why, though. If this forum is such a bad place for you, that you do mute almost everyone, then why come if there's nothing to read for you but onsided scraps of conversations.
That's like going to a restaurant just to sit there. Oo

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Sukubia Scarmon said:

I don't understand why, though. If this forum is such a bad place for you, that you do mute almost everyone, then why come if there's nothing to read for you but onsided scraps of conversations.
That's like going to a restaurant just to sit there. Oo

not really :) it's the same people crying, the same people whining, or the same people spamming everything and anything under the sun, except actual helpful answers.  Just the type of stuff I'd not sooner have to read.

Edited by Adamburp Adamczyk
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RowanMinx said:

And yet again, source Arielle.

With due respect Rowan, The Federalists history is secondary to what is being shown on that page. There is clearly hanky panky going on with the ballot counting as was pointed out in the Youtube video of the Georgia Election Hearing. The call to end the counting at just after 10 pm is confirmed by ABC:

Quote

Later in the night, Regina Waller, the Fulton County public affairs manager for elections, told ABC News that the election department sent the State Farm Arena absentee ballot counters home at 10:30 p.m.

Combined with the sworn affidavits from the 2 observers confirming the same thing along with the video evidence that they were put too far away to properly observe the counting disproves the fact checkers posted above. The video clearly shows ballots being pulled out from hiding and then counted without the Observers present after 10:30. Highly suspect in spite of the spinning.

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Arielle Popstar said:

Oh maybe you could post the list so we can enjoy it too :)

oh I had pondered  that, but there's the whole issue of a) naming and shaming that Governance would react to, and b) the same people i referred too in reports about my posts.  So I can't post it :(

Edited by Adamburp Adamczyk
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Arielle Popstar said:

With due respect Rowan, The Federalists history is secondary to what is being shown on that page. There is clearly hanky panky going on with the ballot counting as was pointed out in the Youtube video of the Georgia Election Hearing. The call to end the counting at just after 10 pm is confirmed by ABC:

Combined with the sworn affidavits from the 2 observers confirming the same thing along with the video evidence that they were put too far away to properly observe the counting disproves the fact checkers posted above. The video clearly shows ballots being pulled out from hiding and then counted without the Observers present after 10:30. Highly suspect in spite of the spinning.

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/12/14/fact-check-georgia-suitcase-video-missing-context/3892640001/

  • Like 3
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RowanMinx said:

Did you know there’s an app that tells you where on the political spectrum news sources fall? It’s made by Canadians, it’s called Ground News.

Youre 100% correct the Federalist isn’t just right leaning, it’s far right leaning.

 

7DE49F41-6A9A-4873-891A-65C257BF2DB4.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Janet Voxel said:

Did you know there’s an app that tells you where on the political spectrum news sources fall? It’s made by Canadians, it’s called Ground News.

Youre 100% correct the Federalist isn’t just right leaning, it’s far right leaning.

Yeah, but why would you believe that? We're all commies and socialists anyways.

Except Arielle, of course.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Sukubia Scarmon said:

I don't understand why, though. If this forum is such a bad place for you, that you do mute almost everyone, then why come if there's nothing to read for you but onsided scraps of conversations.
That's like going to a restaurant just to sit there. Oo

He wants his SL Forums to be like Facebook and other social media -- where the only thing he sees are the things that he agrees with.  They don't have those algorithms in place here, so he just blocks everyone that has a differing opinion.  Keep questioning him on it and you'll join me and others on his block list.

Edited by LittleMe Jewell
  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Sukubia Scarmon said:

I don't understand why, though. If this forum is such a bad place for you, that you do mute almost everyone, then why come if there's nothing to read for you but onsided scraps of conversations.
That's like going to a restaurant just to sit there. Oo

Life is so much easier if you restrict yourself to seeing and hearing people you already know you agree with.

Dialogue? Discussion? Different perspectives? New information?

Pffft. That's for SJWs!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, LittleMe Jewell said:

He wants his SL Forums to be like Facebook and other social media -- where the only thing he sees are the things that he agrees with.  They don't have those algorithms in place here, so he just blocks everyone that has a differing opinion.  Keep questioning him on it and you'll join me and others on his block list.

I mean, if that's what he wants to do, he's free to do so. Ultimately it's him missing out, not anybody else, let alone me. I enjoy conversations with myself! :D

11 minutes ago, Scylla Rhiadra said:

Life is so much easier if you restrict yourself to seeing and hearing people you already know you agree with.

Dialogue? Discussion? Different perspectives? New information?

Pffft. That's for SJWs!

Some people don't want to, or can't, handle those. I can - to a degree - understand if someone says they don't want to be confronted about things all the time. I really just don't get why going to a place where you are guaranteed to get confronted with it.  If one justs wants helpfull answers to clever questions, maybe another parts of the forums would be better suited than the one that is on fire 99% of the time. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Sukubia Scarmon said:

I really just don't get why going to a place where you are guaranteed to get confronted with it.  If one justs wants helpfull answers to clever questions, maybe another parts of the forums would be better suited than the one that is on fire 99% of the time. 

They head for wherever they can whine the loudest...

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Arielle Popstar said:
38 minutes ago, Lyssa Greymoon said:

Did they pull the same trick all three times the Georgia votes were counted? 

No matter. Once was enough to show how low they were willing to stoop.

Why would you believe a president who decided waaaaay before the election that if he lost it would be due to fraud?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/05/president-trumps-false-claims-vote-fraud-chronology/

You can track loads of his additional lies here too:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims-database/?itid=lk_inline_manual_2

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 145 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...