Mollymews 5,074 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 20 hours ago, FairreLilette said: What's the difference of gambling in California or Las Vegas or the internet? real world casinos provide a lot more jobs than do online casinos. It was real world jobs that gave motivation to the US Congress to ban online casinos in the USA 1 Link to post Share on other sites
FairreLilette 3,883 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 1 hour ago, Mollymews said: real world casinos provide a lot more jobs than do online casinos. It was real world jobs that gave motivation to the US Congress to ban online casinos in the USA Different world now though and will be post coronavirus but even pre-coronavirus we could say that about many businesses. It's difficult to look forward yet as we haven't even passed the pandemic yet. So many businesses have already declared they want to be an online only business now, many of those in retail space have. I supposed for the months with no business, property taxes and insurance and licensing, and all kinds of things never got paid. Link to post Share on other sites
Mollymews 5,074 Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 58 minutes ago, FairreLilette said: Different world now though and will be post coronavirus but even pre-coronavirus we could say that about many businesses. It's difficult to look forward yet as we haven't even passed the pandemic yet. So many businesses have already declared they want to be an online only business now, many of those in retail space have. I supposed for the months with no business, property taxes and insurance and licensing, and all kinds of things never got paid. yes, being able to order in stuff is convenient and works quite well for known (standard fare) products is a reversion to an earlier delivery model that worked in the past. Being able to order stuff from a catalogue (or by phoning the local store) and have the stuff delivered to our door we moved away from this delivery model for a time when private vehicles came within reach of people to buy. And the placement of infrastructure to facilitate the movement of the vehicles. Big box stores and supersized supermarkets, etc popped up because of this technology has made producing catalogues a whole lot simpler and easier. Payments also simpler and easier. And the infrastructure facilitating vehicle movement is being re-purposed. Rather than us driving our vehicle to pick up the goods, somebody else is picking up the goods and bringing them to us covid has helped to bump up online ordering/buying for sure. However even without covid this was happening anyway on the impact of covid going forward. At this time our hope is that there will be a vaccine. While we have this hope then we accept mitigation and prudence efforts in the main i think too tho that should there not ever be a actual vaccine for covid and only ever treatments, then people will adapt to this should it become the reality. Is a dismal reality should it turn out that some people will continue to die of this despite treatment at the moment there is hope that a vaccine can be found and while that hope remains then people continue to exercise prudence. However that hope in people's minds will not last forever faced with a bleak future of suppressed income due to prudence, or a dismal future risking death in a way not seen before, then people as a body will choose the dismal future over the bleak future i think we have only a few months before hope fades. About as long as the northern winter I think. Come the northern spring and no vaccine then people will say has been a long hard bleak winter and we are done. Our future is dismal but we are not going to go thru another bleak winter now that spring is here, no matter how dismal the spring will be 1 Link to post Share on other sites
animats 4,107 Posted December 2, 2020 Author Share Posted December 2, 2020 Roblox took a long time to get going, but then... Roblox started as Lego-like, but has slowly become closer to Fortnite-level objects. Like SL, it's a social open world system with building. There really are big wins in this space. Linden Lab had a Roblox competitor, called BlocksWorld. Launched in 2016, it was less successful, and was quietly shut down on June 17, 2020. What went wrong? 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Mollymews 5,074 Posted December 2, 2020 Share Posted December 2, 2020 1 hour ago, animats said: Linden Lab had a Roblox competitor, called BlocksWorld. Launched in 2016, it was less successful, and was quietly shut down on June 17, 2020. What went wrong? the product never gained sufficient users willing to monetarise their ingame experience. User unwillingness to monetarise happens far more times than does willingness. Blocksworld was just a game, like any other game, most of which sink without a trace. In this sense the demise of Blocksworld was nothing special 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Drayke Newall 772 Posted December 31, 2020 Share Posted December 31, 2020 Thought this to be interesting with regards to the metaverse. Virtual Property of the famous New York Stock Exchange Sells for US$23,000 in Upland Metaverse Auction Upland is a blockchain-based metaverse that is mapped to real-world addresses and is basically a literal virtual world monopoly game. What is more interesting is that the reason why they are able to convert that inworld currency to such large USD amount is through their partnership with Linden Lab's very own Tilia… Wonder when the last time someone made that kind of cash in Second Life for 1 parcel of land with a building on it. Also makes one think about that acquisition recently of LL and why it was organised. Was it truly for SL and Tilia or just for Tilia. Link to post Share on other sites
animats 4,107 Posted December 31, 2020 Author Share Posted December 31, 2020 3 hours ago, Drayke Newall said: Thought this to be interesting with regards to the metaverse. Virtual Property of the famous New York Stock Exchange Sells for US$23,000 in Upland Metaverse Auction Upland is a blockchain-based metaverse that is mapped to real-world addresses and is basically a literal virtual world monopoly game. Upland is strange. I suspect they will at some point run into trouble with the SEC. It's not a game, it's a Make Money Fast scheme. You can't do anything with your "parcel" except trade it. There are several "blockchain" based virtual worlds, notably Decentraland and Sominium Space. People trade land there for excessive amounts of money, but don't go in world much. The amount of land is severely restricted to keep the prices up. Both have browser clients, so you can visit those low-rez worlds easily. At least you can go in world there, unlike Upland. Link to post Share on other sites
Ardy Lay 753 Posted December 31, 2020 Share Posted December 31, 2020 Upland, Decentraland and Sominium Space smell like scams to me so they get none of my attention or money. Maybe they just did a *****ty job of explaining what they are. Link to post Share on other sites
Drayke Newall 772 Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 6 hours ago, animats said: Upland is strange. I suspect they will at some point run into trouble with the SEC. It's not a game, it's a Make Money Fast scheme. You can't do anything with your "parcel" except trade it. There are several "blockchain" based virtual worlds, notably Decentraland and Sominium Space. People trade land there for excessive amounts of money, but don't go in world much. The amount of land is severely restricted to keep the prices up. Both have browser clients, so you can visit those low-rez worlds easily. At least you can go in world there, unlike Upland. Yeah it will be interesting to see what happens to it considering they are getting more exposure with the 3 latest massive USD sales. When I first read about it a while ago, I to be honest thought it was the perfect money laundering system and I am like Ardy where I would never go their. Still interesting that whilst not a true virtual world it does still offer virtual land to sell like second life. It's also the first time I've heard Tillia being in partnership with such a large transaction setup. Link to post Share on other sites
ChinRey 6,513 Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 (edited) 14 hours ago, animats said: Upland is strange. I suspect they will at some point run into trouble with the SEC. It's not a game, it's a Make Money Fast scheme. You can't do anything with your "parcel" except trade it. Do I understand this right? They're selling virtual space that doesn't actually exist? Can I do that too? We need a new word for it: metavirtual worlds! 14 hours ago, animats said: There are several "blockchain" based virtual worlds, notably Decentraland and Sominium Space. Sominium Space's most popular promo video on YouTube has managed to rake up a "whopping" 7,100 views over two years. Most of their videos have less than 500 views. Decentraland has one promo video that has managed to get 254,000 views, probably because the exposure they got from the BBC reportage. The rest of their videos aren't performing much better than Sominium Space's. For comparasion, the most popular official promo video for Second Life has 1,000,000 views over five months. OpensimVideo's latest upload got 1,100 views in five months. Is it just me who is a little bit unimpressed? Edited January 1 by ChinRey 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Love Zhaoying 12,468 Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 1 hour ago, ChinRey said: Is it just me who is a little bit unimpressed? But but but..blockchain! 2FA!! 1 Link to post Share on other sites
animats 4,107 Posted January 14 Author Share Posted January 14 Well, the Next Big Thing getting venture capital is "virtual friends". “There are about 86 million Gen Z people today, and I feel that in five years, most or all of them will have a virtual being as a close friend. They’ll share gossip, secrets, have conversations every day. Some of your friends in the Metaverse will be real people, and some will be what we would have called, a few years ago, NPCs, But we’re all avatars, some of us powered by AI and some of us by blood and guts. The Metaverse will be filled with these characters. A virtual being should be able to play with you in Roblox, in Fortnite, be on Instagram and TikTok, text with you and video chat and call and all the rest,” he says. “The characters transcend the game.” This is from a VentureBeat conference later this month. Superintelligent NPCs are still a bit out of reach, but consider how far Alexa and Siri have come. What they seem to have in mind initially is an interaction level comparable to fans writing to a YouTuber. That's chatbot-level, and achievable. Automated Instagrammers are a thing: https://www.instagram.com/lilmiquela/ That's really not much better graphically than SL, except that they have a better renderer that can do skin properly. (The trick is having a subsurface scattering layer in a physically based renderer. Without that, skin is either too flat or too glossy.) I once started working on a machine learning based NPC for SL, but SL doesn't have enough traffic. It would take thousands of interactions per day to train the smarter chatbots. The same situations have to come up many times so the classifier has something to work on. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Lucia Nightfire 1,711 Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 5 hours ago, animats said: There are about 86 million Gen Z people today, and I feel that in five years, most or all of them will have a virtual being as a close friend. Nope. Not a chance. Link to post Share on other sites
Akane Nacht 1,755 Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 On 12/3/2020 at 6:18 AM, animats said: Roblox started as Lego-like, but has slowly become closer to Fortnite-level objects. Like SL, it's a social open world system with building. There really are big wins in this space. Linden Lab had a Roblox competitor, called BlocksWorld. Launched in 2016, it was less successful, and was quietly shut down on June 17, 2020. What went wrong? was just reading something related to Roblox: "In 2018, the top game on Roblox accounted for 8 to 10% of concurrent users, while in 2020, the top game accounts for upwards of 20 to 25% of concurrent users. He proposes two reasons for this concentration: the lack of an upper limit for engagement in games, and the social nature of games leading to winner-take-all network effects." The Creator Economy Needs a Middle Class (hbr.org) not sure what I think about the suggestions in this article as I'm not in the digital creative industry. Was an interesting read tho. Link to post Share on other sites
animats 4,107 Posted February 8 Author Share Posted February 8 The Roblox plan for the Metaverse Roblox has been around for about as long as SL. It's taken a long time to get going. It was smaller than Second Life for years. Then it started to take off. At this moment, 1,803,974 players are connected to Roblox. The company is valued at US$29.5 billion and is about to go public. Roblox's CEO wants to build the Metaverse. Above is his list of what the Metaverse needs. Let's see how SL looks. Identity. You have a persistent identity in the world. SL definitely has that. Friends. Not just people in your MMO clan or party. SL has that. Immersive. SL kind of has that. Are you your avatar, or are you puppeteering your avatar? SL is ambiguous about that. Luca Grabacr points out that a few simple changes make SL more immersive. We don't need full VR. Low Friction. SL falls down here. The new user experience is too painful. That's been discussed before. Variety. SL has that, with a huge range of activities. Anywhere. Not being on mobile is a problem for SL. Economy. SL has a functioning economy, and the users and creators make this world go. Civility. An interesting point rarely brought up. SL does well on this. Without an army of moderators, too. The way private property works in SL leads to not needing too much moderation. SL works well enough that governance meetings are boring. It's like going to city council meetings. So Second Life checks off 6 of the 8 items. Interestingly, the two big problem areas are technical and fixable. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Lucia Nightfire 1,711 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 18 minutes ago, animats said: The Roblox plan for the Metaverse Roblox has been around for about as long as SL. It's taken a long time to get going. It was smaller than Second Life for years. Then it started to take off. At this moment, 1,803,974 players are connected to Roblox. The company is valued at US$29.5 billion and is about to go public. Roblox's CEO wants to build the Metaverse. Above is his list of what the Metaverse needs. Let's see how SL looks. Identity. You have a persistent identity in the world. SL definitely has that. Friends. Not just people in your MMO clan or party. SL has that. Immersive. SL kind of has that. Are you your avatar, or are you puppeteering your avatar? SL is ambiguous about that. Luca Grabacr points out that a few simple changes make SL more immersive. We don't need full VR. Low Friction. SL falls down here. The new user experience is too painful. That's been discussed before. Variety. SL has that, with a huge range of activities. Anywhere. Not being on mobile is a problem for SL. Economy. SL has a functioning economy, and the users and creators make this world go. Civility. An interesting point rarely brought up. SL does well on this. Without an army of moderators, too. The way private property works in SL leads to not needing too much moderation. SL works well enough that governance meetings are boring. It's like going to city council meetings. So Second Life checks off 6 of the 8 items. Interestingly, the two big problem areas are technical and fixable. Roblox doesn't offer complex AAA "looking" avatars like SL. Roblox avatars are slightly evolved Lego men at best. The "worlds" are also simple looking like something out of Animal Crossing. The user dynamic is not the same as SL's aging audience either. Link to post Share on other sites
Janet Voxel 5,692 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 12 hours ago, Lucia Nightfire said: Roblox doesn't offer complex AAA "looking" avatars like SL. Roblox avatars are slightly evolved Lego men at best. The "worlds" are also simple looking like something out of Animal Crossing. The user dynamic is not the same as SL's aging audience either. It’s core user base is also 8-12 year olds. My nephew stayed with us summer before last, he’s 12, so at the time I watched him play it he was 10 and he was playing with other 10 year olds. So yeah....not the same audience. Link to post Share on other sites
Solar Legion 3,811 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 3 minutes ago, Janet Voxel said: It’s core user base is also 8-12 year olds. My nephew stayed with us summer before last, he’s 12, so at the time I watched him play it he was 10 and he was playing with other 10 year olds. So yeah....not the same audience. Yep, and this is one of the many reasons people need to stop trying to compare other bloody products to Second Life ..... 3 Link to post Share on other sites
Janet Voxel 5,692 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Just now, Solar Legion said: Yep, and this is one of the many reasons people need to stop trying to compare other bloody products to Second Life ..... Well....the guy that's always talking about Robolox and Fortnight said it so....I don't think he'll ever get it. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now