Jump to content
You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 379 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Sorciaa said:

Firestorm and I believe i mentioned SL in my post. and as far as a tinker toy I am talking about a pretty high end desktop, not a 5 year old potato. Its pretty well documented this " game " is not optimized at all and it will drag a high end PC down So I will have to assume whatever you are running it on was crafted at Hogwarts.

It's not the "game" - it's the content - which is created by other users. Give Catznip a go, I get much better performance from it than I do Firestorm, though your mileage may vary. As for being a "fat pig" -the viewer footprint of (even the fat Firestorm) on your hard disk is a helluvalot leaner that 90% of the apps you have. So... it may not be a tinker toy you use, but still a hand-shovel in comparison to what you should have, based on your description of performance, perhaps.~shrugs~

Edited by Alyona Su
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Are you serious? With that budget, try playing Minecraft on low graphics instead of SL. Or buy a Huawei phone and install a Second Life viewer on that. I don't think you are serious.

I think it’s safe to say no, it would not work best. Without knowing what’s in it, it’s impossible to say if it would be acceptable or not. Intel graphics runs a whole range, from not being able to ru

Computers are like race cars.  Speed costs money; how fast do you want to go?  If all you care is to go $300 worth that will probably give you a $300 speed. Come up with a budget and the shop for

Posted Images

4 minutes ago, Sorciaa said:

Firestorm and I believe i mentioned SL in my post. and as far as a tinker toy I am talking about a pretty high end desktop, not a 5 year old potato. Its pretty well documented this " game " is not optimized at all and it will drag a high end PC down So I will have to assume whatever you are running it on was crafted at Hogwarts.

Actually, I do have what you call a "5 year old potato":

Quote

CPU: AMD FX(tm)-6100 Six-Core Processor (1761.42 MHz)
Memory: 15927 MB
OS Version: Linux 5.2.11-1-default #1 SMP Thu Aug 29 06:41:19 UTC 2019 (6385110) x86_64
Graphics Card Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
Graphics Card: GeForce GTX 950/PCIe/SSE2

And I can run *any* viewer (Windows-only viewers via PlayOnLinux) just fine, thank you very much! 😈

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sorciaa said:

Firestorm and I believe i mentioned SL in my post. and as far as a tinker toy I am talking about a pretty high end desktop, not a 5 year old potato. Its pretty well documented this " game " is not optimized at all and it will drag a high end PC down So I will have to assume whatever you are running it on was crafted at Hogwarts.

Mine must have been crafted at Hogwarts then.

ASUS M51BC Series
Windows 10 Home 64bit
AMD FX(tm)-8300 Eight-Core Processor, 3.3 GHz, 4 Core(s), 8 Logical Processor(s)
RAM 24 GB
ASUS GeForce GTX 1050 OC 2GB

 

Obviously I've replaced the graphics card and upgraded to Win10.

https://www.asus.com/us/Tower-PCs/M51BC/

 

And yes, I use FS. 

Edited by Selene Gregoire
Link to post
Share on other sites
You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 379 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...