Jump to content
arial Bagley

Sexy bbw looking for a daughter

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 678 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Recommended Posts

Sexy collared babygirl and her Master looking for a Daughter. Must be English speaking and willing to be collared to my Master and I both.

if you are intrested either get ahold of me here or in world 

 Serious inquires only. No smart ass replies (see below) thanks.

Edited by arial Bagley
Added info

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a babygirl, if you have a daughter, and your Daddy Dom falls in love and partners her, that makes your daughter your mom, but as you are also your mom's mom, you would then become your own grandma.

Edited by Callum Meriman
  • Like 2
  • Haha 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, LittleMe Jewell said:

Pardon my ignorance, but what is 'bbw'?

Beautiful Black Woman was my assumption.

Edited by Love Zhaoying
Arrgh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Cindy Evanier said:

Or Big Beautiful Woman

This. ~points up~

Because initials like MILF (an acronym) and BBW (not an acronym) are YouPorn dot com street-cred phrases when you use them like they were part of everyone's native lexicon. ~snickers~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Love Zhaoying said:

I’m more used to seeing another letter after “BB”.

BBC?

Well known as an excellent news source for the rest of the world.  In the UK they are just as biased as any other local "for profit" media.

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Lindal Kidd said:

/me sidles slowly away from a situation that looks perilously close to a major Terms of Service violation.

Good point, though I don't see any mention of child-like appearance in there. I see a lot of girls (and some boys) roleplaying as "legal-age" teens (and do appear as "young adults" even if shorter) and it's the same elephant-in-the-room as is at nudie beaches and places like that.

Heck, I'm taller in SL than I am in RL - all to avoid any skirting with ToS issues LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As someone with real-world BDSM experience, Baby-Girls/Boys (or Littles as they are called in the scene) is not a violation of the TOS. It is a legally aged individual who takes on the mental state and or emotional state of a child, in order to fulfill escapism, and to relinquish responsibility of maturity for a time. In a sense, the easiest way for non-kink people to understand the kink dynamic (I myself may not fully understand it, so please correct me anywhere I am wrong!) is one very similar to real-world adults taking care of other adults who have slipped into senility (only light-hearted, rather than incredibly sad.) Like Puppy/Pony play. There is a misrepresentation that all kink is centered around sex, when really, it's not. Sex may have a lot to do with how people express kink, but BDSM is more about the dynamic of power, and the taking/surrendering of it in a consensual manner.

It is NOT playing on a desire for child pornography or pedophilia. And as someone who also has a parent who took some criminal psychology during their Masters program.... Someone into children wouldn't likely be attracted to an adult acting or dressing like a child, at least not in a long-term sense. It tends to be brief, and creates a lot of frustration. Imagine being addicted to soda, but there is only water--- and you never lose your craving for soda... The water will work to quench your thirst, sure, but it will do NOTHING to fulfill your longing.

In the real world, the adults are still adults, no matter how they dress or act. IF they are using child avatars, then yes, it may skirt the TOS--- but only if sex is involved.

That being said... I'm not sure why the need was to specify that the person looking for the daughter is sexy.

Just chiming in my, possibly way off in left field, two cents worth.

Edited by GarouGrey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, GarouGrey said:

but only if sex is involved.

a little way off yes

accounts get canceled for proximity to content of a lewd or sexual nature. The ToS conditions are broader than jumping on a poseball and doing it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ellestones said:

a little way off yes

accounts get canceled for proximity to content of a lewd or sexual nature. The ToS conditions are broader than jumping on a poseball and doing it

I can see that for someone using a child avatar, yes... but what about adult avatars? I mainly meant that unless there is anything of a sexual nature going on, the kid avi is just.... a kid... normal to any family rp going on that doesn't involve a BDSM dynamic... I think, however, the OP is looking for a sexualized dynamic, otherwise the need to state the mom as being sexy wouldn't of existed.

And yes, lewd and sexual natures should right be kept as far away from actual, or depictions of children. I am not arguing that fact at all! Or arguing in general. I just wanted to make it clear that because some choose to express a BDSM dynamic in a sexual manner does not make that dynamic as a whole a sexual thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@GarouGrey

am just pulling the discussion back from the edge. I live on an adult sim where most of our community are into bondage. Most of who are into bondage as a lifestyle, RL as well as online. Is only two of us who aren't. I am one of them. I find the people in my SL community to be pretty laid back and quite chilled out about most things, as I think you are also

is a line in these matters, and with or without a ToS anyone who comes into this community, SL and RL, gets hammered when they put themselves on the line. Lines can blur really quickly when discussing BDSM in the context of baby girls and baby boys. Is a short step to go over the line when adults play what they consider to be legal traps, acessorised as barely-legal according to their  own judgment

is also difficult to parse your statement: "some choose to express a BDSM dynamic in a sexual manner does not make that dynamic as a whole a sexual thing."

if is not in whole a sexual thing, then it is in part. Is the part that can put us on the line. I think that when we look at our avatar and wonder about whether we are on the line, then more times than not we are

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really feel like....some of you....not all but some..... are just CONSTANTLY hovering on the edge of your seats with a printed off copy of the TOS in one hand, petrified look in your eyes, mouse in the other hand....scanning each thread wildly and and muttering to yourselves "Something here breaks TOS.....we must maintain order.....WITHOUT THE TOS WHAT IS THERE......ANARCHY....THE TOS MUST BE UPHELD....." 

Also OP,  I think its weird that prospective mom to be feels the need to mix "sexy", "baby girl"  and "daughter" into the same sentence.

I will never understand you fantasy incest role-players and your desperation's for role-play daughters that double as your sex partners...

Although I will give you this, your level of weirdness somewhat normalises my experimental adventures with a fur......never mind.....

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 678 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...