Jump to content

COMPLEXITY/DISPLAY


Julia Oxalis
 Share

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 2151 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Recommended Posts

(LOOK THE PIC) Hello guys, i want to ask something really important about display section, i want to know why does it happens... when I tried it on my own hair (linking & unlinking), i can't see a big difference about each other in display section like this hair from truth. I really want to understand about it, what does it means? I tought it was a way to decrease display status, but it doesn't work to me.

 

why.png.056f4f07f1455df177eccd9abf1e09d4.png

It's a BIG difference, it doesn't looks normal :o

 

Thanks for the attention <3 ^^

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's because the render cost formula uses texture consolidation within linksets. If two or more items use the same texture, each instance of the texture is added separately to the calculated render cost if they are unlinked. If the items are linked, the texture is only included once.

With fitted mesh, the render cost is just a meangless number anyway. The formula has a couple of other bugs and errors too - some of them even bigger than this - so there is no relationship whatsoever between the calculated and the actual render cost.

Edited by ChinRey
Typos
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, ChinRey said:

It's because the render cost formula uses texture consolidation within linksets. If two or more items use the same texture, each instance of the texture is added separately to the calculated render cost if they are unlinked. If the items are linked, the texture is only included once.

With fitted mesh, the render cost is just a meangless number anyway. The formula has a couple of other bugs and errors too - some of them even bigger than this - so there is no relationship whatsoever between the calculated and the actual render cost.

thank you so much! ^^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 2151 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...