Canoro Philipp

do you like Complexity or Simplicity?

43 posts in this topic

Posted (edited)

Usually simple is best.  Easy.  Predictable.  Point A to point B on the straightest path possible.  Get things done with the least amount of drama.

But

I'd be lying if I said I don't occasionally revel in absolute chaos.  The excitement of it, anticipation, puzzling out and untangling the threads of turmoil and bedlam - just getting right in the disarray and bedlam and rolling in it until I'm enveloped.

So, I would live simplicity and visit complexity, but I am much more passionate about the chaos.

How's that for a non-answer?

Edited by Cinnamon Mistwood
Ugh, spelling
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found myself leaning towards complexity, its a passion to enjoy the details, where everything goes, I like complex things.

some are more inclined to the elegant space of simplicity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

If we're talking about SL avatars, then simplicity is best.  I don't mean we should all look like 2006 newbies but so much complexity is unnecessary. When I switch off jelly dolls to look at those high draw-weight avatars lagging a club to a standstill, they don't necessarily look any better or any more complex than the lower draw-weight ones that were not jelly dolls in the first place.

Edited by Conifer Dada

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Simplicity in some things, complexity in others.  Sometimes it depends on "what" it is, sometimes it depends on my mood / day of week / moon cycle / who knows.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Simple: Pepperoni pizza

Complex: With mushrooms, black olives, sweet Italian sausage, caramelized onions, grilled tomato slices and topped with fresh chopped basil.

 

They both have their merits.  Brute force vs strategically applied science.  A gentle caress vs a shibari suspension.  I can't choose between them.

7 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Canoro, your question wants context:

I don't want complexity in a medical treatment.
I do want it in a mystery novel.

I don't want simplicity in a life partner.
I do want it in a front bra clasp, though not so much that it opens while I'm out dining with friends.

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm gonna go with Simplexity if we were to be talking about nature,which I love trying to squeeze in any conversation I can..(see,I did it again):ph34r:

There is just so much awesome in either direction..

 

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

see! I don't always make stuff up sometimes... O.o

Edited by Clover Jinx
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My RL career has been a bad case of "take the complex and translate into a simple, digestible format" - so I'm going with Simplicity....

Its less work :-)

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, AmandaKeen said:

My RL career has been a bad case of "take the complex and translate into a simple, digestible format" - so I'm going with Simplicity....

Its less work :-)

In my RL career, making something simple to use/understand was both difficult and rewarding.

“Make things as simple as possible, but not simpler.” - Albert Einstein (paraphrased).

Edited by Madelaine McMasters
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, Madelaine McMasters said:

In my RL career, making something simple to use/understand was both difficult and rewarding.

“Make things as simple as possible, but not simpler.” - Albert Einstein (paraphrased).

Amen. The spoils go to anyone who can simplify anything. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of complexity - I just tried on an old gown in my inventory (from 2013).  It has a complexity value of 2,799,508 - quite impressive.  I think I'm going to have to find the right scene for a picture of this one.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Madelaine McMasters said:

In my RL career, making something simple to use/understand was both difficult and rewarding.

“Make things as simple as possible, but not simpler.” - Albert Einstein (paraphrased).

There are days I have to resort to speaking very slooooowly and loudly to my target audience :-) Upper Management translation issues......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, AmandaKeen said:

There are days I have to resort to speaking very slooooowly and loudly to my target audience :-) Upper Management translation issues......

Unfortunately, for most of my career, I was upper management (self employed). So it was imperative I make things simple enough for me to understand.

;-).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Madelaine McMasters said:

Unfortunately, for most of my career, I was upper management (self employed). So it was imperative I make things simple enough for me to understand.

;-).

I'm doing analysis for a multinational group on the upper-end. Trying to explain Pop Culture to other cultural groups is interesting, although it often underscores the absurd points of pop culture :-) "Its not supposed to make sense, its allegedly funny" Some days its fun, some days my brain hurts :-)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, LittleMe Jewell said:

Speaking of complexity - I just tried on an old gown in my inventory (from 2013).  It has a complexity value of 2,799,508 - quite impressive.  I think I'm going to have to find the right scene for a picture of this one.

I have just the ring for that, after a discussion here about engagement and wedding rings, it was said you could get some good ones cheep, so I bough tone just to see how good it was, It cost 5L and looked fabulous, but the complexity if the ring alone was over 400000. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Second Life is a very complex world and it overwhelms many new users. I choose complexity.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oriolus Oliva taught me an important lesson once. He showed me a drawing he had made of a house facade and it looked so complex and full of wonderful little details. Then he demonstrated how simple the picture actually was, how few lines he had drawn to achieve that effect. You can see the same in his SL works too, they look so complex and full of life and details, yet if you start analyzing them, they are actually very simple.

I think that's my answer when it comes to Second Life: make more out of less.

Edited by ChinRey
Fixing some typos
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now