Women degrading advertising in search

[CarlottaAdagio]

If the shoe fits, wear it.

To all you rape & torture supporters: Go and seek psychological help. You have lost yourself in a morally corrupted dreamworld. Out yourselves in the real world and you will see how wrong and distraught you are. First I was angry at you but now I only feel pity for you.

Don't bother answering this thread. I will not follow it anymore. I will rather forget all you sorry people...

[Freya Mokusei]

---

CarlottaAdagio wrote:

To all you rape & torture

supporters

: Go and seek psychological help. You have lost yourself in a

morally corrupted

dreamworld. Out yourselves in the real world and you will see how

wrong

and

distraught

you are.

First I was angry

at you...

---

Judgey judgey judgey. You can usually tell the authoritarians because they react with anger before empathy (and cliché follows soon after).

Such useless appeals to a morality you barely hold yourself, you're clearly trollin' at this point. No-one's supported the strawmen you're putting up. Sorry-not-sorry we won't change our exciting, healthy and consensual behaviour for you or your regressive agenda.

Thanks for confirming almost everything I've posted. You won't be missed!

[Ceka Cianci]

---

Freya Mokusei wrote:

---

CarlottaAdagio wrote:

To all you rape & torture

supporters

: Go and seek psychological help. You have lost yourself in a

morally corrupted

dreamworld. Out yourselves in the real world and you will see how

wrong

and

distraught

you are.

First I was angry

at you...

---

Judgey judgey judgey. You can usually tell the authoritarians because they react with anger before empathy (and cliché follows soon after).

Such useless appeals to a morality you barely hold yourself, you're clearly trollin' at this point. No-one's supported the strawmen you're putting up. Sorry-not-sorry we won't change our exciting, healthy and consensual behaviour for you or your regressive agenda.

Thanks for confirming almost everything I've posted. You won't be missed!

---

They are just Trolling..

I give them a score of 3/10 for getting 8 pages with unoriginal material..

It was an ok troll,but not nothing to write home about really..

 

hehehehe

[Freya Mokusei]

---

Ceka Cianci wrote:

I give them a score of 3/10 for getting 8 pages..

---

Screw that, we got 8 pages. Her content was rubbish, the people drawn were largely because of the positive points being made.

I actually had a fair bit of fun, and would rather not credit her with that. She's anti-fun.

[Ceka Cianci]

---

Freya Mokusei wrote:

---

Ceka Cianci wrote:

I give them a score of 3/10 for getting 8 pages..

---

Screw that,

we

got 8 pages. Her content was rubbish, the people drawn were largely because of the positive points being made.

I actually had a fair bit of fun, and would rather not credit her with that. She's anti-fun.

---

I stand corrected..

hehehehe

[Rhonda Huntress]

---

Ceka Cianci wrote:

I give them a score of 3/10 for getting 8 pages with unoriginal material..

---

8?  Is the default 10 posts per page?

I see 2 pages.

[Freya Mokusei]

---

Ceka Cianci wrote:

I stand corrected..

---

<3!

[Madelaine McMasters]

---

Ceka Cianci wrote:

I stand corrected..

---

I thought you were hanging upside down.

[Phil Deakins]

What gets me about all this is that you were over at my place for some time, and I behaved like a perfect gentleman throughout. You never even hinted that it would be ok to ravage you!

[Freya Mokusei]

---

Phil Deakins wrote:

I behaved like a perfect gentleman throughout.

---

??? I had to steer chat back to the straight and narrow on more than one occaision!

But if that's how you remember it then okay.

Typical strategy for those I would rather impress intellectually is to sublimate sex/roles. SL suffers a derision of interest. I definitely did discuss it briefly!

For clarity WRT the thread (not accusing you of misinterpreting, but audience might): Wouldn't have been okay to ravish me.

Voiced fantasy != consent.

[Madelaine McMasters]

---

Freya Mokusei wrote:

Typical strategy for those I would rather impress intellectually is to sublimate sex/roles.

---

sublimate: (of a solid substance) change directly into vapor when heated

 

I can help you do that!!!!

[Freya Mokusei]

---

Madelaine McMasters wrote:

I can help you do that!!!!

---

Ya but can you help me do it to Phil's, er, little head?

>.>

<.<

Asking for no reason.

[Phil Deakins]

Purleeeeze. I used to have a much bigger head until she did it to me. I tell ya she's dangerous. Stay away!

[Phil Deakins]

---

Freya Mokusei wrote:

---

Phil Deakins wrote:

I behaved like a perfect gentleman throughout.

---

??? I had to steer chat back to the straight and narrow on more than one occaision!

---

Ah yes, but a part of being a perfect gentleman is to discreetly fish for clues as to what will please a lady. Perhaps you're not used to meeting perfect gentlemen like me

[Freya Mokusei]

---

Phil Deakins wrote:

Perhaps you're not used to meeting perfect gentlemen like me

---

Can guarantee not.

But conversely:-

(Took me forever to find the radio edit for this forum, oof!)

 

[Madelaine McMasters]

---

Phil Deakins wrote:

Perhaps you're not used to meeting perfect gentlemen like me

---

Phil, is this you?...

Had the characters been reversed and the Heinken been Point Root-Beer, that would have been me. So there's no shame in admitting it...

...because we're both perfectly shameless.

[Dillon Levenque]

I just wanted to jump in quickly to say I've been following this thread since the beginning and while I've enjoyed everyone's response (especially Freya's) to the self righteous prig of an OP, I must say the whole tone of the thread has improved mightily ever since Message #76.

:-)

[Ceka Cianci]

---

Rhonda Huntress wrote:

---

Ceka Cianci wrote:

I give them a score of 3/10 for getting 8 pages with unoriginal material..

---

8?  Is the default 10 posts per page?

I see 2 pages.

---

I never really messed with any forum settings very much..It may be..

[Phil Deakins]

That would definitely be me, but not because I'm a gentleman - because I really dislike the taste of beer and such. However, if I did like it, I would still have given it to the lady - especially after she heard me singing "Give it to me". Well, a gentleman deserves something in return, doesn't he? 

[Christin73]

If you have ever looked on mp for anything, lets say you type in mp search police uniform. You typlicy get sexy police uniforms for women, or anything else you search for. For some things i have had to resort to the male version in order not to get the sexy version. People assume that all women in sl want to be sexy not practical.

[Freya Mokusei]

---

Christin73 wrote:

If you have ever looked on mp for anything, lets say you type in mp search police uniform. You typlicy get sexy police uniforms for women

People assume that all women in sl want to be sexy not practical.

---

A very valid point, and I fully agree.

However - to bolster your point further - Google Image Search suffers this same problem, and I fully expect the majority of other online search tools, too.

You're on the money, but this might be more a more deeply-rooted issue than one affecting MP or Second Life in particular.

@Dillon Thanks for the compliments! Glad you've been enjoying!

[Rhonda Huntress]

Well, it is always futile to have a logical discussion with someone who is expressing their emotional opinion.  There is no common place to start.

[Prokofy Neva]

It's interesting you're even calling them "women".

So often I open search and without having selected this option, I am shown a CHILD with a flat chest, and with an adult performing a grossly lewd act on the CHILD. I abuse report this constantly as do others; it's back every week.

I am tired of being FORCED to view content I don't want that goes to the top of search just to keep 'adult" ticked off so I'm not blocked from my own land when I fly around to respond to tenants' requests.

This is one of my huge annoyances and I think until 100 of us band together and mass abuse report every night to get their attention, we will not solve this.

[Prokofy Neva]

All of this is irrelevant because those of us opening up search and having to see vulgar child pornography or distressing BDSM smut that degrades woman (do strip away all the baloney about "power exchange) have not CHOSEN to do so.

ALL L WE HAVE DONE IS OPEN UP SEARCH.

These ugly disgusting sites open up AUTOMATICALLY as events or places. The Lindens of course could remove that function. We could manually open search with our search terms and take it from there.

What's happening is that this content is surfaced due to the Lindens' algorithms and is pushed into our face FORCIBLY.

That needs to stop, because no one should be forced to participate in BDSM against their will.

[Prokofy Neva]

It's fine to shame people who take away others' rights and who deceive them with opposite-sex avatars. More than fine.