the lindem have a power superior, takes precedence over the federal constitution's Article 171, lar

[dextercrammer]

takes precedence over the federal constitution's Article 171, larceny. In Which the image characterize the crime of embezzlement
ie it has a greater power than the very law?

[Alwin Alcott]

if you want to discuss things, put a post on the forums,

if you want a answer of legal issues, contact the legal departent of LL, but be sure you are directly involved in the issue as copyright owner or designer or lawyer representing a client, or you wont get a response.

if you have a more techinical user related problem or question, feel welcome to post here

[Theresa Tennyson]

---

dextercrammer wrote:

takes precedence over the federal constitution's Article 171, larceny. In Which the image characterize the crime of embezzlement

ie it has a greater power than the very law?

---

1) The only Constitution Second Life would theoretically fall under would be that of the United States, which has no Article 171.

2.) What happened to you could only be considered fraud, not embezzlement or larceny.

3.) Any law that might have been broken would be by the person who you had the problem with, not Linden Lab.

[mikka Luik]

A quick search seems to indicate you are referring to an article of the Brazilian penal code concerning fraud. Now while it would be entertaining to watch if this ever went to court, I think you may be out of luck.