Kelli May 23 Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 Happy New Year, you surly brass-stud. Glad to see you posting again. eta: also, LL's appalling censorship protocols continue, preventing me from referring to you by the name they allow you to use. Genius. Link to post Share on other sites
SirLeighBastard 0 Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 Kelli May wrote: Happy New Year, you surly brass-stud. Glad to see you posting again. eta: also, LL's appalling censorship protocols continue, preventing me from referring to you by the name they allow you to use. Genius. Isn't LL's self-contradiction wonderful! It might make you wonder if they have even half a clue. ***Call me anything you like, but be warned you may be ***bleeped*** Link to post Share on other sites
Darrius Gothly 709 Posted December 31, 2015 Share Posted December 31, 2015 I believe that one-half is the mathematical minimum required to attain an acceptable sampling rate. Link to post Share on other sites
SirLeighBastard 0 Posted January 7, 2016 Share Posted January 7, 2016 I had half a mind to work for Linden Lab. ***Call me overqualified Link to post Share on other sites
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
YouTube
Flickr
Recommended Posts
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now