Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Aislin Ceawlin

Just to clarify.......

Recommended Posts

Hi Phil, I notice the same handful of trolls that bully people on the forums and I rarely come here.  I'm sure their E-peens are large and hard since this thread is all about them and it's 25 pages! lol :P

But yeah I know people in world that will not post here because they will be attacked for various reasons and that's not right. It's sad that people feel the need to put others down on a public forum.  How hard is it to treat others with kindness and respect?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


FairuzaB wrote:

...
 I'm sure their E-peens are large and hard
since this thread is all about them and it's 25 pages! lol
:P

.... 
How hard is it to treat others with kindness and respect?

 

 

Go figure!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Phil Deakins wrote:

I actually RICed one of my own posts in this thread.


On the charge of completely having lost the plot: GUILTY BUT INSANE

The jury is now discharged; please send in the Sickologist

The Judge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FairuzaB. It does seem to be like that, doesn't it. I've been absolutely amazed at how many of them there are. I really didn't know before this thread. Some people who I would never have thought it of have stepped up to the plate on the troll side.

Earlier this afternoon I told somebody that it's changed the forum for me, to the extent that I'm actually considering not bothering with it any more. It's not that some people are like that - there always were a few. It's how many of them there are, and who they are. I had absolutely no idea before this thread. It's been a real revelation for me. They aren't driving me out, if I stop, as Pep did to people, but I may stop bothering because I have no desire to 'mix' with so many bad apples; i.e. there are too many people now that I can't treat normally any more. Most people here are good, of course, but there are too many bad apples.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


FairuzaB wrote:

 I'm sure their E-peens are large and hard


FairuzaB wrote:

  How hard is it to treat others with kindness and respect?

On the charge of demonstrating overt self-condemning hypocrisy within the space of four sentences: GUILTY

 

 

The Judge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


FairuzaB wrote:

Hi Phil, I notice the same handful of trolls that bully people on the forums and I rarely come here.  I'm sure their E-peens are large and hard since this thread is all about them and it's 25 pages! lol
:P

But yeah I know people in world that will not post here because they will be attacked for various reasons and that's not right. It's sad that people feel the need to put others down on a public forum.  How hard is it to treat others with kindness and respect?

 

Not only my E-peen!

And 25 pages is nothing, just come back in a few hours. Or no, forget that, Uncle Phil will have it closed before the nurse rides him back to the closed ward for the night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Phil Deakins wrote:

I'm actually considering not bothering with it any more.


Silence in court! If there is any more of that disgraceful display of cheering, whistling and tumultuous applause . . . I will join in!

The Judge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the charge of an ESLer asking if what she wanted to say was relevant: GUILTY

Obiter Dicta: The question was: "What do you get if you cross a rhino and an elephant?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


jujmental wrote:


Phil Deakins wrote:

I'm actually considering not bothering with it any more.


Silence in court! If there is any more of that disgraceful display of cheering, whistling and tumultuous applause . . . I will join in!

The Judge

:|

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Phil Deakins wrote:

And thank you for clearly showing your colours, Venus.
I appreciate it
;)

You are another one who I wouldn't have believed it of, but here you are making it perfectly clear.

Incidentally, my behind the scenes stuff wasn't solicited by me. I didn't write anything anywhere, except in the posts - not in PMs, IMs, feeds, or anywhere else - so it wasn't encouraged by me. People did it of their own volition and kindness, and, to the best of my knowledge, there was no discussion going on behind the scenes on my side. On the other hand, the troll did write stuff about it behind the scenes. It was being discussed in a ridiculing way, and it did cause useless support to arrive. One of them hadn't been seen in the forum for years, and yet there she was, right out of the blue. And then she went away again.
You
can add it up however you like, and call it a hell of a coincidence if that's what you want, but 2 + 2 always equals 4 in my book. Being psychic isn't necessary
;)

You haven't suddenly turned up at all. You're always in the forum.
What you have done is shown a huge bias in favour of nasty people.
You are perfectly free to like what they do, of course, but defending it doesn't speak very highly of the person who defends it.

ETA: Incidentally the PMs to me have been known about for some time now. Maybe you missed that. I didn't reveal (confirm) anything new in my post to you.

Characterizing people as 'nasty' is a matter of opinion.  I have read nasty online and I have not yet read nasty in this thread.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


FairuzaB wrote:

Hi Phil, I notice the same handful of trolls that bully people on the forums and I rarely come here.  I'm sure their E-peens are large and hard since this thread is all about them and it's 25 pages! lol
:P

But yeah I know people in world that will not post here because they will be attacked for various reasons and that's not right. It's sad that people feel the need to put others down on a public forum.  How hard is it to treat others with kindness and respect?

 

Now, who missed doling out your meds to you today?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Phil Deakins wrote:


This thread is showing me more and more what some people are like in the forum. I can hardly believe that I hadn't noticed it before, but I hadn't.
So Celestiall is another one.
Before this thread, I wouldn't have believed it, but here it is, in plain sight.


Yes, Phil this thread is showing more of what some people are like. 

What am I, "another one"...of Phil?  Would you care to elaborate?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Phil Deakins wrote:

one of whom is the troll, of course.


Here's the crux of it Phil.  You so hate (or dislike if "hate" is too strong a word) this one person, what your views of others are colored by how you see this person interact.   One either falls into the "victim" status  (of someone who the "troll" picks on), which means you extend them every sympathy and exception.

Or, one falls into a different category, where you see all manner of ill-intent. 

As for derails, you've done a colossal job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Phil Deakins wrote:

Hi FairuzaB. It does seem to be like that, doesn't it. I've been absolutely amazed at how many of them there are. I really didn't know before this thread. Some people who I would never have thought it of have stepped
up to the plate on the troll side.

So, this person suddenly popping into the thread, and siding with you, means they aren't a troll or part of a "clique", but are obviously on the good side of the force.  (Since they immediately sided with you ; )

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Celestiall Nightfire wrote:

 

Here's the crux of it Phil.  You so hate (or dislike if "hate" is too strong a word) this one person, what your views of others are colored by how you see this person interact. 

On the charge of hating - as Phil has admitted in print, in public - someone on the basis of an event that he now admits may not have even happened, with the version of events existing in his mind being contradicted unanimously by those with better memories and records: GUILTY

Obiter Dicta: One of two possibilities exist. Either Phil is genuinely losing his marbles and should consult a medical professional, in which case everybody should feel sorry for his pitiful state, or he has a hidden agenda, consciously or even subconsciously, prompted by feelings of inferiority and insecurity, which may be a more acceptable diagnosis from the point of view of anyone in contact with him in real life, but is just as unacceptable in terms of harassment in these forums.

The Judge

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty much done with this thread now but, just for the record, I have never said that I hate anyone, and I certainly don't hate anyone. I do hate some things that some people do though, if that's any help. You must have me mixed up with someone else - or you're making it - probably the latter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Phil Deakins wrote:

I'm pretty much done with this thread now but, just for the record, I have never said that I hate anyone, and I certainly don't hate anyone.

Strike this from the record! The plaintiff clearly expounded, in a now deleted recent thread, upon his hatred for an individual based upon a false or fabricated memory of events which have been proved never to have happened. His amnesia is now affecting his short as well as his long term memory.

On the charge of being persistently risible: GUILTY

On the charge of apparently reducing his stated commitment from exit from the forums to exit from this thread: GUILTY

The Judge

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Undoubtedly the argument has moved on, but Pie suggested something which deserves a response.

 

For all the time I argued with Pep, I never once saw him come anywhere close to wishing cancer upon anyone. He posted many things I may have found objectionable, but never that.

 

Also, anyone mentioning cliques has forgotten their history. The term is FIC. It's always FIC, regardless of context in an SL forum!

 

Love.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Love.  I don't know if you recall, but we had a brief encounter in a different house.  I hope all is well with you. 

Anyway, I couldn't agree with your post any more than I already do re: Pep's posts.  This was my point to Phil a few days ago--in a now deleted thread.   If Phil doesn't accept it now, he never will--but he just doesn't want to.  

 

    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Sylvia Tamalyn wrote:

/me borrows some panties from Venus, and salutes Laurin and Love. 

 

(Gosh, I hope I did it right!)

Isn't it I that should be saluting?  Especially with you clad in Venus's panties! 

PS I am easily confused...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Phil Deakins wrote:

I never lie - ever.
If I ever say something that isn't true, and I want it to be believed, then I believe it to be true.
Lying is when the one who says it knows it to be false AND intends it to be believed. I don't lie.

http://gizmodo.com/5913730/scientific-proof-that-everyone-lies

 

http://www.brainfacts.org/in-society/in-society/articles/2013/the-truth-about-lies-the-science-of-deception/

 

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/news/news/890/

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...