Paul Hexem Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 You know what bugs me about group chat in SL?Not that it doesn't work, but that LL is screwing up 30 year old technology. 33 years, to be exact.And IRC has been around for 25 years.How can LL possibly screw up something that every other company out there mastered two to three decades ago? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kylie Jaxxon Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Agree...the same as they can't seem to fix the "keep me signed in" option I have that option checked at numerous sites for years and have yet had to re-sign in unless I change something...go figure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenimore Hapmouche Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Amen to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenni Darkwatch Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 To be fair, IRC had problems with very large channels as well. Nonetheless you're spot on. Compared to even ancient tech like IRC, SL's chat is primitive. Then again, IRC clients scripting abilities haven't been matched by many other chat protocols, nor have the excellent channel controls/flags. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gino Taggart Posted July 9, 2014 Share Posted July 9, 2014 I really need group chat, is there any chance the LL will get around to making this work? There's not much reason to ahve a group if they can't be contacted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freya Mokusei Posted July 9, 2014 Share Posted July 9, 2014 Haha, nope. Hasn't worked since they built it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qie Niangao Posted July 9, 2014 Share Posted July 9, 2014 On the contrary, there's always hope! ... and in this particular case, I don't think that hope would be entirely baseless. Last I heard on the subject, Simon was making progress on significant improvements to chat. (Incidentally, for obscure reasons that I don't recall and probably never completely understood, group chat in SL is somehow very different from what IRC and XMPP can support. It's not as if LL never tried those obvious approaches, but they were dismal failures.) (EDIT: Even more incidentally, there are lots of reasons for SL Groups, completely unrelated to chat. That's part of the problem with Groups: they try to do too many things, so they don't do any of them very well. Thinking of it that way, however, I suddenly wonder if there's anything relevant to be borrowed from Google Hangouts.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenni Darkwatch Posted July 9, 2014 Share Posted July 9, 2014 Just a side note: IRC doesn't scale well for very large channels. XMPP servers have a lot of performance issues if not tweaked to absolute perfection, and they too suffer from the large group problem. And anyone who ever used IRC will probably remember those lovely netsplits. One big issue with group chat is getting the messages out to everyone in a reasonable amount of time without getting them out of order. IRC gets around that by not worrying about order. I have no idea what XMPPs policy on that subject is. (Disclaimer: Former IRC Operator) I still like IRC's channel management abilities far and above most every other medium. Extensive channel control abilities rock. Coincidentally I'd also love the IRC ban/exempt abilities for SL land and local/group/voice chat, especially moderation flags and such would be useful in many cases. Some of that can be implemented client-side btw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now