- 0
Is oblivious/indifferent author a valid excuse to sell stolen content for profit? (Flagging policy)
You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 4070 days.
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Question
Runk Scientist
Sure I get it that only the original creator of the stolen content can take any real legal actions, but why can't a regular "civic detective" even give a hint about clearly suspicious content?
Whenever I browse the Marketplace, there is always quite a high risk of bumping into content blatantly ripped from video games and such, sold as personal works for big money. As a sharp eyed OCD gamer, it is not very hard for me to notice the lack of the tiniest difference between a sold item and its original video game counterpart. Heck, I've even seen the works of my personal modder friends being sold here without their permission. (Who however, as the real authors, probably managed to get them down after a hint.)
But yeah. It's not like every video game producer or modder could just go through the whole marketplace in search for their content. Maybe the smaller producers, most people don't even know, can't get to hear about their content. Maybe the bigger ones don't even care. But does this actually make it any less wrong to steal content and get away with it?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now