Jump to content

"I disagree"


You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 2889 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Recommended Posts

it's possible that i may or may not agree to disagree with your statement, possibly. I will not commit to the idea that disagreement or agreement has its merits or disadvantages. weighing the pros and cons i find that i will have to remain ambiguously ambivalent, perhaps.

Link to post
Share on other sites


Drake1 Nightfire wrote:

it's possible that i may or may not agree to disagree with your statement, possibly. I will not commit to the idea that disagreement or agreement has its merits or disadvantages. weighing the pros and cons i find that i will have to remain ambiguously ambivalent, perhaps.

I disagree.  I'm not sure I understand what you wrote, but I disagree anyway. :|   Could you expand of this a little further so I can be more empathic in my disagreement?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am really annoyed that you disagree with my statement.

I put it in as plain English as I could.

If you would take the time to read it again, maybe you would understand.

So here is what I said and some clarity too.

Its all here bright as day on this white paper, now read and understand.

What I said is:

I don't like the way you walk, so straighten up and fly right, got it?

 

 

I am Teagan Tobias and I agree with my statement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Agree with you Storm! Some people here seem to either not understand what they are reading or don't really read a post at all but feel they must comment and disagree with the poster no matter what, even if their comment shows that they are really agreeing with the poster's opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 


Storm Clarence wrote:

"I don't understand what you wrote, but I vehemently disagree with you.  
Please provide some clarity so I can
 "take you down" for that statement--even though I still don't understand what you wrote."  

Posting to the poster and not the post?  Perhaps?  

 


"it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." ... William Faulkner

 
Link to post
Share on other sites


Storm Clarence wrote:


Allisah wrote:

I agree that you were clear and no further clarification is necessary.

It really has nothing to do with clarity does it?  It has everything to do with *who* writes the words... not the words itself.

 

No, it has nothing to do with clarity. It does have everything to do with "who" writes the words for some reason which should not be the case at all. Seems more personal and IMO that's wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wouldn't be inaccurate to assume that I couldn't exactly not say that it is or isn't almost partially incorrect. I'm possibly more or less not definitely rejecting the idea that in no way with any amount of uncertainty that I undeniably do or do not agree to disagree with your stance.

Hopefully that in no way clarifies the situation of my profoundly enigmatic stance on your previous statement.

Link to post
Share on other sites


Qie Niangao wrote:


Storm Clarence wrote:

It has everything to do with *who* writes the words... not the words itself.

Oh yeah?

Amethyst Jetaime wrote:

"it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." ... William Faulkner


I disagree.  A tale told by an idiot is not understood by a reasoned man.  We listen to idiots all day; I disagree with everything they write. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
You are about to reply to a thread that has been inactive for 2889 days.

Please take a moment to consider if this thread is worth bumping.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...