Viewer 3 Sucks. Give us Viewer 1 UI

[JohnMiddlefield]

---

Luc Starsider wrote:

I would hardly call LL an IT company - let alone a pure one. They are a service provider where the service happens to be an online service. A social experiment more than anything else. That does not make them an IT company any more than, say, Facebook is an IT company. The viewer, as such, is more of a byproduct of the service than a main product (or even main part of the product).

- Luc -

---

Nit-picking as what makes an IT company or not is hardly relevant. Regardless, the viewer is the backbone for the success of SL, and not the adding of bells and whistles to entice 0.01 % of potential users.