Hypatia Meili

I have had items show up with no name on my "Manage Listings" page. I have found that if you preview the item, you can check which item it is via the contents tab, and then edit/change the listing name to match. You can then click [update] to fix the name, and proceed normaly after that.

I noticed another issue with using autofill: "Items will show up in searches that apply to the listing that was used to autofill but do Not apply to the current item it self." (Note: Searches that do apply still work.)

It is still happening! But the Jira apears to have been closed, with final note to contact support. Previous experince leads me to expect that, anyone going to support with this issue will likley be told "to file a Jira". *sigh* The best work around is to imediatly check the listing after updating a product, and then fix the listing.

I do not know about anyone else, but I will probaly mostly be going back to boxed items that need to be unpacked when this happens. I do not generally keep the unboxed folders in my inventory but do keep the boxed version to be sold in world either as is or in an inworld vending device. I have enough stuff in my invemtory as it is. There for except for indvidual rezzable objects most of my items will be reverting to "needs to be unpacked"! Additionally I am woried about accidently chaging permsions on items for sale from inventory. As it is now you check items when you send it to the marketplace and double check it in preview and they stay the way you sent them, period. I can see the new set up causing a lot more items getting released to the wild with wrong permissions. Also exzactly how sperate will sales folder be from the rest of out inventory, weedo not wan to set the wrong stuff for sale.

Or add a filter to search for or filter out demos, like you can filter for perms. I would also like to sew a filter for Mesh or non-Mesh, but that is another issue.

The most common bad review I see is, "Item was not delivered". which is a marketplace falure and not a reflection on the product, and is usualy not chagred for or auto refunded when the transaction fails. If for some reason the buyer is charged they need to file for a refund via LL not the seller who almost always has not gotten paid when this happens. most smiply do not relize they were not charged. Also as far as I can tell a bad review is beter then no review it seems to still increase the items rankining, of course a good review is better. It is however hard to be sure the way the marketplace software works. Something else I have noticed is that most people do not leave a review unless they absolutly love an item ot have a problem. which means most people do not rate items. Under the old sytem buyers use to be able to rate an item with out making a text comment and signing it, and people did do so, now that is not posble so most people do not bother. Also ther use to be a feature that would show you items that you had purchased and had not yet rated that also encoraged buyers to do so. This feature was dropped the result is that practically no one rates anything anymore.

Previously I have smiply relisted items that were erroneously removed, if somone is maliciously flaging an item you need to file an AR.

Are there any other significant changes? In plain everyday English please. Most of us can't read legalese, well we can read it but understanding it is something else. And I figure I am probably bit above average in following it, still it confuses me.

That is kind of what I figured though I dont 'know' the LL back end, "They dont have the ablity". But they must have people who can implment it. Sombody should also realize its even easyer for LL in the long run. Easyer then: LL delists, merchat guesses at problem and relists, LL delists again, merchat trys again, rince repeat etc etc.

What i do not under stand is why LL can not incude a mesage to the mechant on what is wrong. I am sure they could even partaly automate for less work on their end just click few check boxes, "wrong catagory" and type in the corect one, "Inapropriate Keywords(please check)" maybe type in which ones, "Should be Marked Adult". its almosy childish that they just remove them without notifyng you why.

As part of the Vortex Help Staff. I have made the following compromise suggetion several time, actual powers would be better. Since LL does not seem to want to give out any actual powers: Bump ARs at Vortex from Vortex Staff Members to the top of the queue, or give us special chanel(method) to call for help. And the same for any other LL public locatons with a caretaker group. I am sure this could be automated.

It is one of the Oracul ones. I belleive the main Avatar currently assiociated wih those now is "daiz Papp" The in world shop also sells loose animation to make your own custom sets.

try "wearing" one and then "Adding" the other -> "Add Item". It sounds like they may possbly be worn on the same atachment point. This is just a guess.

The "Oracul" AOs generaly contain each animation in 3 diffrent version for 3 diffrent avatar sizes, labled as "child", "teen" & "adult" you choose which size best fits your AV and load that set via the menu. . P.S. note: The designation as child teen or adult is based on the incorrect(for actual avatar size) "agent height" measurement not actual prim measured height.

There is also an as yet unfixed bug with "Female" shapes related to the "Torso Muscles" setting. This the setting that control arm thickness. If the setting for this under "Female" & "Male" is not identical then, when wearing a "Female" form it will randomly display wrongly to you and or other veiwing you. If you want a detailed step by step fix for that I wil post it.