- Forums
- :
- Technology Forum
- :
- Second Life Server
- :
- Deploys for the week of 2012-02-13
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Deploys for the week of 2012-02-13
[ Edited ]- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-13-2012 04:46 PM - last edited on 02-14-2012 05:17 PM
- Improved performance for the following functions in LSL scripts compiled to Mono:
- Bug Fixes
- SCR-121 Entire sim (65,536sq.m.) owned by group, llGetParcelMaxPrims(llGetPos(), TRUE) Returning odd number.
- SVC-7348 moving_end() event executes on moving, script-rezzed physical objects
- SVC-7443 Telehubs overridden if teleporting a friend/avatar to a region where telehub exists outside of the telehub area
- Fixed 1 simulator crash related to the physics engine
- Made improvements in code for starting and stopping regions
- Internal code improvements with better memory management and more efficient object updates
- Fixed data in CoarseLocationUpdate messages for avatars above 1020m. These are now sent with a value of 255, which was previously sent as 0 in error. This fixes numerous mini-map issues with avatar relative altitude indicators.
- Fixed a script crasher in llList2List.
Re: Deploys for the week of 2012-02-13
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Reply to Oskar Linden - view message
02-14-2012 03:56 AM
Oskar
Pardon me if I sound a note of caution... Yes last week's roll to the RCs doesn't seem to have thrown up any bugs or issues, but surely running a series of server replacements simultaneously with a server software roll out is flying in the face of conventional logic?
We are told time and again that LL operates a secure service and that stringent QA checks accompany any changes. So now we see two groups working on the servers at the same time doing different things.
How on Earth will the techs know which change produces a problem if two things are being changed at the same time? That flies in the face of all logic and all that I was taught about maintenance.
I operate on Heisenberg's uncertainty principle - If I know where I am I don't know what I'm doing there.
Re: Deploys for the week of 2012-02-13
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Reply to Ayesha Askham - view message
02-14-2012 05:47 AM
The RC rollout last week was a pretty big test, though it would have been a lot of work if a problem had emerged. And it would have annoyed a lot of customers.
As for the hardware maintenance, I figure we're lucky to get this much ifo about what's going on.
I see what you're getting at with the apparent timing. There is usually an announcement that the software roll-out has started: nothing yet. My guess is that this ongoing hardware maintenance has effectively been tested against the new sim code already. with enough of the RC sims running on the new hardware. But since they never seem to say anything--Oskar is an exception--we're left to speculation. And, yes, some of us with experience of running a business, or maintaining a computer network, sometimes think whisky tango foxtrot.
Re: Deploys for the week of 2012-02-13
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Reply to Oskar Linden - view message
02-14-2012 09:02 AM
Trying to do two things at once and keep track of the changes to a working system is next to impossible, but this is par for the course for Linden Labs and Oskar cannot be blamed for this. The key fact thoush is not just doing two things at once, but the fact that this is a system at work and you can never tell how it will react to even the best tested code, and if the past is a measure LL code is seldom well tested. My main concern though is introducing new code to the RC servers before we can fully tell the effect of last weeks effort.
Granted last week has let to great improvements in the RC servers, but the memory leaks and the crashes that go with them have not stopped and will not be fully able to be measured til this code is installed on the main servers and we can judge it against the background of the whole system. Right now it is impossible to tell how much memory is lost in a RC server as opposed to a main server and we badly need a week to judge the impact of last weeks changes on the system as a whole and to see the effect today's server work and the work that will inevitably follow will have on the entire system.
Simply, declaring this fixed and rushing on to another project invites disaster and duplicates the behavior that caused this massive problem in the first place, so for once let's err on the side of caution, take a week to access the results of these changes on the system as a whole, clean up the remaining problems then consider what to do next. This I realize is not the Linden way but at this point given the mess we are just emerging from maybe it is time to find a new way based on caution, careful consideration and testing rather than a blind rush toward a lemming like disaster. Again I realize Oskar has little to do with making this decision and am addressing this to his superiors in hopes that they will step back fromt he brink and maybe spare us another disaster that we cannot afford to endure.
Re: Deploys for the week of 2012-02-13
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Reply to Oskar Linden - view message
02-14-2012 11:24 AM
I sure hope the promoting goes well seeing how my two warnings went ignored. Half the people on my magnum sim can't rezz and the other half can't delete items not to mention prim shift is rampant in linked objects by a full .100m. Lag is higher then normal too and we had to cancel our racing event yesterday from these issues
Re: Deploys for the week of 2012-02-13
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Reply to Oskar Linden - view message
02-15-2012 02:54 AM
Oskar
Release notes please for the RCs? I still see last week's there.
I operate on Heisenberg's uncertainty principle - If I know where I am I don't know what I'm doing there.
Re: Deploys for the week of 2012-02-13
[ Edited ]- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Reply to Ayesha Askham - view message
02-15-2012 09:42 AM - last edited on 02-15-2012 09:59 AM
Oskar
Just what is going on?
Our sim (21071 Woods of Heaven) is being rolled as I type this...but to what? Your release notes above link to last week's roll. We are already on 12.02.06.248938! We were rolled to that last Wednesday.
The post on the GSP refers to Beta/LeTigre: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Beta/LeTigre...what on earth is that?
I am very concerned that the only information I can access is very clearly WRONG.
I operate on Heisenberg's uncertainty principle - If I know where I am I don't know what I'm doing there.
Re: Deploys for the week of 2012-02-13
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Reply to Ayesha Askham - view message
02-15-2012 10:37 AM
I know Kuula had a restart, about an hour ago now. Running code marked as "Second Life RC LeTigre 12.02.02.248819".
That looks odd
It may be something to do with fixing the bug in the Region Crossing code, which made such a mess the weekend ofter it was rolled out 12-01-25, because there is a mention of some changes in the Region Crossing code.
Removed unnecessary information being transferred across region boundaries during region cross, causing possible instability.
The timing is plausible. Am I going to risk crossing a boundary this weekend? For some reason, I am suddenly finding it hard to trust the Lindens.
Re: Deploys for the week of 2012-02-13
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Reply to WolfBaginski Bearsfoot - view message
02-15-2012 10:55 AM
@Wolf
Well, I had my Whisky Tango Foxtrot moment, for sure!
Got back in after the region restarted and sure enough we are also running 12.02.02.248819, and also sure enough, all the release notes are now showing the version we are running.
The date of the code is very strange, it almost looks like a reversion, though the code has never (to my knowledge) been on the Main Grid before. I am beginning to think that Oskar also had a wtf moment today as well.
This may well have to do with region crossing, so I'm polishing my crucifix up for tonight. I ain't afraid of no Ghost!
I operate on Heisenberg's uncertainty principle - If I know where I am I don't know what I'm doing there.
Re: Deploys for the week of 2012-02-13
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Reply to Ayesha Askham - view message
02-15-2012 05:06 PM
The dating looks odd, but it may indicate that they've been running this code for a prolonged test on the beta grid to try and find memory leaks and the like, or just to catch embarrassing bugs.
If there's something weird, and it don't look good, who ya gonna call?

